Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
1.94

Awesome: 6.32%
Worth A Look: 7.37%
Just Average: 18.95%
Pretty Crappy: 8.42%
Sucks58.95%

5 reviews, 65 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Fortress, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Garfield: The Movie
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by David Cornelius

"Unfunny and annoying... just like the comic strip."
1 stars

There are a good twenty-some reasons to hate “Garfield,” the live action comedy based on the classic comic strip. But the only reason you really need is that it’s just not any good. It’s a lazy formula piece without any real workable jokes or even much of a useable story. It’s harmless, but it’s an annoying harmless.

Problem number one is that the screenplay, by Joel Cohen and Alec Sokolow, seems to come note for note straight out of some movies-for-kids scripting handbook. The plot is this: Garfield meets Odie, Garfield gets jealous of Odie, Odie gets lost, Odie gets kidnapped by Villain, Garfield leaves to rescue Odie from Villain. It’s as if the script was picked from a Use the Most Clichés contest, and this one came in third but got picked because the first two were too smart. (Heck, one scene, in which Garfield and a mouse friend crosses the street, is a direct steal from “Toy Story 2,” only they forgot to steal the humor and charm.)

It’s not as though I was expecting massive strokes of original brilliance here (this is, after all, based on a comic strip that has reused the same five punchlines over and over for the past few decades, sort of a three-panel Marmaduke). But there’s an unlikable absence of crispness to the material. The jokes are as lame and tired as the ones cartoonist Jim Davis has been giving us for years, only they sound even more groan-worthy once we hear them out loud. (“I think I’m going to blow Cat Chow chunks” is the screenplay’s idea of a good one-liner. Here’s another: a pun-happy rat says “Keep it squeal!” Yawn.)

As for Garfield, the CGI is fairly convincing... until the cat has to interact with anything or anyone. Then it’s as hokey as they get. Sure, the cat himself looks pretty good, and the decision to make Garfield the only CG character in the film is understandable (helps create a sense of realism while also making him look closest to his comic strip form). I’ll even forgive the strange absence of a cat butt (which, as every pet owner knows, cats will put right there in your face, where you don’t want it), since it’s kinda like the Hulk having mysteriously stretchy boxer shorts.

But every time somebody talks to him, or holds him, or looks at him, it’s distractingly obvious that the cat just ain’t there. Maybe little kids won’t mind. Sure bugged the crap out of me, though.

Another problem with the movie: those pesky human actors. Breckin Meyer’s Jon (who’s reinvented as a lovable schlub instead of the complete loser he is in the funnies) is a too-generic family movie character, and his romantic subplot involving Jennifer Love Hewitt is a royal snooze. With all their time wasted reacting to CGI characters or animal actors, there’s nothing interesting for them to do. They’re not characters, they’re filler. (To see a great performance against both an animal and CG cast for comparison, check out James Cromwell in “Babe.”)

The only human cast member who gets to do anything of interest is the brilliant Stephen Tobolowsky, hamming it up as a villainous talk show host. His character is standard kiddie movie bad guy crap, but Tobolowsky knows it and has some light fun with the part anyway. Not that it helps too much, though, as he’s reduced to tiny scenes of unnecessary cruelty. The movie finds way too much humor in disturbing shock collar gags. Is electrocuting people really that funny?

As for Bill Murray, who supplies the voice of the title character, well, it’s inspired casting, sure, but you can tell Murray’s bored with the part. There’s just no life to the performance, and he even seems uncomfortable at times having to say the asinine things he’s asked to say. We get from Murray the classic mellowness of Garfield, but there’s no energy in the scenes that require it. (His only lively moment is when Garfield sings “I Feel Good” at the movie’s end. Lively, sure, but as irritating as they get, too. I mean, “I Feel Good?” Come on, people.)

The actor’s his reluctance to the role spills over to real life: in a recent appearance on “The Late Show With David Letterman,” Murray never plugged the film at all, and when Dave closed the interview as he always does by mentioning that the film opens in theaters on Friday, you could see Murray roll his eyes, look a bit embarrassed, and refused to discuss it. When you’re getting that kind of reaction from the movie’s top star, you know you’ve got a problem.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=10008&reviewer=392
originally posted: 02/25/05 16:05:39
[printer] printer-friendly format  
This film is available for download or online viewing at CinemaNow.com For more in the CinemaNow.com series, click here.

User Comments

1/29/10 Dane Youssef Sorry, just didn't work. All wrong. Garfield wasn't made 4 live-action. This isn't Garfield 1 stars
5/16/09 Buck Terrible, I've never seen a hot vet running around in a short skirt the whole movie. 1 stars
1/05/09 the dork knight who are you kidding? watch the damn cartoon instead 1 stars
12/03/08 Shaun Wallner This movie was stupid! 1 stars
9/06/08 Blargh TERRIBLE, NOTHING LIKE THE COMIC, since when was nermal a siamese?! 1 stars
3/22/08 Carly Great, enjoyable movie. Not a fan of the cartoon but a great movie. Good animation too. 4 stars
2/20/08 KIKA ALDELA RAHMAYANTI THE LAZY MAD CAT 3 stars
2/17/08 Pamela White just watch the belly jiggle and you have to smile 4 stars
4/18/07 Stevo UK As if the cartoon wasnt bad enough, they had to make a feature lenghth. well, thanks a lot. 1 stars
12/21/06 David Pollastrini not horrible 3 stars
12/19/06 David Cohen Bill Murray hasn't been in a good movie since Ghostbusters, Viva Lorenzo Music! 2 stars
12/07/06 Stanley Thai A good, enjoyable film. VERY UNDERRATED! 3 stars
9/07/06 drydock54321 good conversion to live action 4 stars
6/08/06 CTT I like the comic strip, and still loathed most of this 2 stars
1/06/06 JM Synth Depends whether or not you like the comic 4 stars
10/30/05 mad mumma pretty good, as is the comic strip 3 stars
10/27/05 jess i was pretty cool u guys just wanna sound like stuck up critics 4 stars
8/18/05 ES Odie should have been animated! = dumbasses 2 stars
8/08/05 Del Not completely terrible 2 stars
7/20/05 Lydie Great film, great animation, I loved the dialogues 5 stars
6/20/05 darick Not true to the comic...predictable as plot, miscasts, inconsistent CGI, laughlessness, etc 1 stars
6/06/05 Neville Schoof Saw the preview.. that was lame enough 1 stars
4/15/05 Carol Conway Boy was this bad! 1 stars
4/02/05 Cindy As a cat lover, I loved the movie. It was very cute. 5 stars
3/30/05 hannaho What kind of debt did Murray have, that he had to make this? 1 stars
3/22/05 Suzanne Butler why does Hollywood think we need remakes of EVERYTHING?? 2 stars
3/15/05 Judith Musick OK FOR KIDS 3 stars
3/12/05 Jack Scallops Could've been better. Read the strip and watch the show instead. 2 stars
3/04/05 Chris Stephens the kids liked it 3 stars
3/02/05 David Tsung murray was in it for the money 1 stars
3/01/05 Maggie Dressler Even grownups - especially grownups - likes this one 5 stars
2/27/05 Diane Stedner not what you would expect 3 stars
2/26/05 Alice Colwell It's a kids movie 4 stars
2/25/05 Darlene Wright Good Kid Movie 4 stars
2/25/05 Joy Venters I THOUGHT IT WAS PRETTY FUNNY 3 stars
1/27/05 Jack Scallops So-so, the show is better than both this movie and the comic nowadays 3 stars
12/29/04 Doremimi It's just too bad that "1 Star - Total Crap" is the lowest rating available. 1 stars
12/24/04 Freddy SUCKED and the dog is real and nothing like cartoon Odie. Don't waste time watching this! 1 stars
11/07/04 Brody Kenny no laughs and no charms 1 stars
10/14/04 eugene biggest load of fucking crap 1 stars
9/17/04 Helen Bradley Bill Murray as always great 5 stars
9/16/04 Kyle Wellcome Its a fun movie, no intelligence needed. 3 stars
9/14/04 Naka Total ass, plain and simple. 1 stars
9/14/04 Neo Garfield rox, this movie sux 1 stars
8/29/04 Chris Cross THIS IS A VERY GOOD FILM YOU ALL OTHER HAVE NO INTELLIGENCE 5 stars
8/18/04 qemm very boring, even for cats and garfield fans 2 stars
8/03/04 8=====D this puts the cartoon to shame...SHAME I SAY!! :( 1 stars
8/02/04 alice Oh my god !!! WHY ?? I love Garfield! WHY ???? 1 stars
7/25/04 Alex Disgusting 1 stars
7/21/04 Whitney Bullard This is one of the worst animated movies ever!! 1 stars
7/20/04 April Gupton I COUD NOT wait for this to be over 1 stars
7/17/04 legend Bad cat! Bad cat! Awful film! Awful film! 1 stars
7/14/04 mdailey The 25+ product placements say it all. This movie sucks! 1 stars
7/08/04 Nathan Fuller Possibly the worst film I've ever seen 1 stars
7/06/04 Saigo Utter trash. 1 stars
7/05/04 Spiderfan720 I hate Garfield period but this was over the top!!! 1 stars
6/28/04 Ray CRAP 1 stars
6/27/04 KENT Horrible . . . just horrible. 2 stars
6/24/04 John Okay movie. Garfields nature is done great but the origin is just a mess. 3 stars
6/23/04 Gray Harmless fun 5 stars
6/21/04 Marc Basque Stupid, unrealistic yet harmless and funny 3 stars
6/18/04 Hilarium What a waste of Bill Murray. 1 stars
6/13/04 Chris Taylor I always thought "Howard the Duck" was the worst movie ever made. Until I saw this film. 1 stars
6/11/04 Brian At least we didnt get "Family Circus - The Movie." 1 stars
6/11/04 dave not fit to print 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  11-Jun-2004 (PG)
  DVD: 06-Jun-2006

UK
  N/A

Australia
  16-Sep-2004




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast