Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 5.48%
Worth A Look27.4%
Just Average: 20.55%
Pretty Crappy: 21.92%
Sucks: 24.66%

6 reviews, 37 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Rob Gonsalves

Madeline's Madeline by Jay Seaver

Won't You Be My Neighbor? by Rob Gonsalves

Brothers' Nest by Jay Seaver

Mandy by Peter Sobczynski

Gonjiam: Haunted Asylum by Jay Seaver

Maquia: When the Promised Flower Blooms by Jay Seaver

Field Guide to Evil by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed

Around the World in 80 Days (2004)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"Take a classic story, then make it look just like every other movie."
3 stars

"Around the World in 80 Days" is an example of modern Hollywood's dumb way of thinking. There is no reason for a congenial Chinese martial arts expert to be in this story, as the Jules Verne novel is about Englishmen and Frenchmen and involves very little hand-to-hand combat. To you or me, this would mean not putting Jackie Chan in the film. We would would find someone else to star.

But not in Hollywood. In Hollywood, no idea is too untenable. If a big star wants to be in a movie, he or she will be shoe-horned in at all costs, regardless of what damage it does to the film. Hollywood believes that when people go to the movies, they are paying to see CELEBRITIES, not to watch interesting stories.

Unfortunately, Hollywood is probably right, and movies can make $100 million based solely on who's in them, even if the movies themselves are crap. And so here is "Around the World in 80 Days," which spends about an hour getting past its casting and screenwriting hurdles before finally settling into an even, enjoyable pace. That first hour, though: Man. It's pure death.

Jackie Chan plays a Chinese man named Lau Xing, currently in Victorian London to steal back a sacred jade Buddha from the band of Chinese terrorists who swiped it from his village to sell to the unscrupulous Lord Kelvin (Jim Broadbent). While fleeing the cops, jade Buddha in hand, Lau Xing falls into the yard of inventor Phileas Fogg (Steve Coogan) and pleads with him to hire him as his new valet (so he can hide out, of course). Fogg insists he only hires French valets, so Lau Xing gives him a cock-and-bull story about his mother being French, and comes up with the fake name Passepartout after seeing someone walk by with a passport.

And I ask: Why? You wanna put Jackie Chan in the film, fine. Change Passepartout into a Chinese immigrant or something. Why give Fogg the odd trait of refusing to hire any but French valets? Is it because Passepartout isn't a Chinese name and you think Chan has to be named Passepartout? Well, he doesn't. Hardcore fans of the novel aren't going to forgive you just because you retained the character's NAME if you completely changed everything else about him. Ugh, Hollywood mentality frustrates me.

Anyway, Fogg hires "Passepartout," then makes a bet with Lord Kelvin, who is head of the Royal Academy of Science, that he can circumnavigate the globe in 80 days. In the 19th century, this is absurd, and Kelvin calls him on it: If he can do it, Kelvin will step down from his post and give Fogg the position instead. If Fogg loses the bet, he has to stop inventing and never darken the Royal Academy's door again.

So Fogg and Passepartout are off. In Paris, they pick up a woman named Monique (Cecile de France), an artist who joins them ... um, for no reason, really. She says she needs to get away from Paris. She's not in the book; she's in the movie because movies are supposed to have love interests for their caucasian male leads. (The Chinese ones, of course, go loveless.)

All this extra baggage -- Passepartout being on the run from the cops and from bad guys, the stolen sacred artifact, the pretty blonde tacked on as a plot device -- these reek of art-by-committee, focus-group interpolation. Verne's novel is a high-flying adventure story. Here, it's been genericized so it resembles every other Hollywood adventure movie.

The second half of the film is much faster and funnier than the first half. We're past the ridiculous moment where Fogg is shocked -- shocked! -- to learn that the Chinese-looking Passepartout with the Chinese accent is, in fact, Chinese; past the extended, over-long Gov. Schwarzenegger cameo; past the part where Rob Schneider has a cameo; and on to more reasonable entertainments. Steve Coogan has a wonderfully dry delivery that provides several laughs, and though he doesn't belong here, Jackie Chan is always such a likable guy. And he does do plenty of the fighting he's known for.

(By the way, if your movie doesn't require Rob Schneider, why would you go out of your way to include him? You should count your blessings your movie DOESN'T have Rob Schneider, not defy the gods by squeezing him in anyway.)

The director, Adam Sandler veteran Frank Coraci ("The Waterboy," "The Wedding Singer"), is hobbled by the script from David Titcher, David Benullo and David Goldstein, none of whom has done much before. (I wonder if they decided to work together because they're all named David.) The screenplay believes that because it's about an around-the-world tour, it's OK if it has long mini-adventures here and there. In fact, this is only OK if the mini-adventures are exciting or in some other way diverting, not pointless, like these.

Postscript: Whenever I watch films set in the past that are lazy in other ways, I like to see if they got lazy with their history, too. This one most assuredly does. It is set in 1890, according to the newspaper front pages shown, yet there is a climactic scene involving pieces of the unassembled Statue of Liberty ... which in 1890 had been erected and standing in the harbor for four years. There is also a glimpse of Vincent Van Gogh in a Paris art studio, though in real life he spent the first half of 1890 in an asylum and in Auvers-sur-Oise, and the last part of it dead. Finally, the characters refer to visiting Constantinople, which is correct. But the onscreen title calls the city Istanbul, which didn't become its name until 1930. (Why did Constantinople get the works? That's nobody's business but the Turks' ... and the filmmakers', I guess, who changed the name 40 years early.)

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=10010&reviewer=247
originally posted: 06/16/04 19:47:03
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

2/16/18 Dr.Lao It wasn't terrible 3 stars
11/04/15 David Hollingsworth ridiculous and worthless. 1 stars
4/06/15 Imaad Unwatchable. Does full injustice to Jules Verne's book. 1 stars
2/22/08 Pamela White unbelieveably stupid 2 stars
1/01/07 Anthony Feor discusting 1 stars
11/29/06 Stanley Thai An enjoyable remake. Fun for the family. 4 stars
3/09/06 Dk A good idea goes out the window 2 stars
1/16/06 Ariadne Christina Renee Gladstone Who'da thunk it? I actually enjoyed a movie with Kathy Bates playing royalty! 4 stars
4/23/05 Quigley poor Shwarzenegger! what mindless bullcrap dribvel for Disney! nothing's new, i guess 1 stars
3/21/05 reptilesni I laughed like a fool through this whole thing! 5 stars
2/20/05 Captain Craig If you look at it as a movie made for familys and kids its fine. Jackie is always good. 4 stars
2/10/05 Jeff Anderson TERRIBLE REMAKE! I'd rather sit through endless viewings of CUTTHROAT ISLAND than this crap 1 stars
11/26/04 Destiny Pifer Pretty funny movie! 4 stars
9/06/04 Gregor I thought this movie was funny, and had a nice touch. Who cares if it is a remake. 4 stars
8/28/04 john bale Another dud remake, why bother, Coogans no David Niven, and Mike Todds not in sight. 2 stars
8/25/04 conor great awful 1 stars
8/19/04 Cape Canaveral Lavigne Though a likeable actor, J Chan's martial arts antics always get in way of a coherent plot. 4 stars
8/19/04 Ariadne Christina Renee Gladstone Who'da thunk it? I actually enjoyed a movie with Kathy Bates playing royalty! 4 stars
8/15/04 reptilesni What a wonderful film! Who really is a "hardcore" fan of this book anyway? 5 stars
7/29/04 Eloise wholesome family fun 4 stars
7/18/04 sally i loved this film. Enough action for my husband and son and enough story for me. Good fun. 5 stars
7/13/04 Clairemont Not that bad. Steve Coogan was the highlight. But check out some of his other work 3 stars
7/10/04 Chanie Jack Not as bad as the reviewer made out - enjoyable (if rather low-brow) entertainment. 4 stars
7/07/04 jenny oh man this was the worst movie i have ever seen in my whole life 1 stars
7/06/04 mazie i thought it was absalute pants 1 stars
6/29/04 Roxie It was pretty cute. Not fantastic, but still enjoyable. 4 stars
6/28/04 Sephylon Greenleaf Surprisingly not sucktastic. A warmhearted, amusing adventure for seekers of grand escapism 4 stars
6/22/04 Drummie It tickled my laughing bones.. 4 stars
6/21/04 jam good-humored 4 stars
6/21/04 jc hm 5 stars
6/20/04 SIr Spam-a-lot Pierce Brosnan and Eric Idle in the TV VERSION were MUCH better.... 2 stars
6/18/04 Emily i liked the fighting scene 3 stars
6/18/04 Bob F. Sandler's friendship can't bail Coraci out of this one. 1 stars
6/17/04 Alex A fun summer action comedy. The cameos are great. 4 stars
6/17/04 Karl Even the cameos can't save this one. Stay away at all costs. 1 stars
6/17/04 dave blah, jackie chan should retire 1 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  16-Jun-2004 (PG)
  DVD: 02-Nov-2004



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast