Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 1.43%
Worth A Look: 21.43%
Just Average: 1.43%
Pretty Crappy: 35.71%

8 reviews, 22 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Pick of the Litter by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Peter Sobczynski

House With A Clock In Its Walls, The by Peter Sobczynski

Life Itself (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

Unity of Heroes by Jay Seaver

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Rob Gonsalves

Madeline's Madeline by Jay Seaver

Won't You Be My Neighbor? by Rob Gonsalves

subscribe to this feed

Must Love Dogs
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"By-the-numbers, but at least it's Lane and Cusack doing the painting."
4 stars

I can't pretend to like romantic comedies, but I can't pretend not to like Diane Lane and John Cusack, either. In "Must Love Dogs," a perfunctory but entertaining rom-com based on a novel by Claire Cook, Lane and Cusack play the parts Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks would have taken a decade ago -- except that Lane and Cusack are a little smarter, a little more mature than their predecessors. "Must Love Dogs," until its sell-out finale, is a rom-com with a brain in its head.

Lane plays Sarah, 40-ish and recently divorced, now the victim of rampant matchmaking by her many siblings. ("Doesn't anyone have a friend for Sarah?" her father asks. "'A friend for Sarah'?" she says. "Now I'm an episode of 'Little House on the Prairie'?") In the same unnamed Southern California city, there is a man named Jake (Cusack), also newly divorced and being encouraged by his friend Charlie (Ben Shenkman) to get out there and sleep with as many women as he can. But Jake is no cad. He wants something real, you know?

These two meet, inevitably, thanks to Sarah's sister Carol (Elizabeth Perkins) posting a profile for her on PerfectMatch.com. After the obligatory montage of Sarah on dates with various losers, she meets Jake, and there is a bit of a spark.

But meanwhile, Sarah, a preschool teacher, has also met Bob (Dermot Mulroney), the father of one of her students. He's separated from his wife and cute as a button, and this constitutes the film's only real conflict: Sarah likes two boys at once (three, if you count the fact that Dermot Mulroney and Dylan McDermott are the same person).

I considered this lack of dramatic conflict a flaw before I realized I was enjoying the film anyway. Certainly this scenario is more realistic than most rom-coms, where one of the guys would be an obvious jerk and we're just waiting for Sarah to dump him, or where Sarah would think Bob only likes her because she lied and told him she's an astronaut, or whatever.

The film, adapted and directed by Gary David Goldberg, does dissolve into the usual idiocy in the end, with people making public declarations of love and jumping into rivers to pursue one another and that sort of thing, but I suppose a certain amount of convention is required. In fact, hardcore fans of this genre might reject this film on the grounds that it is not formulaic enough.

Lane played a role like this in "Under the Tuscan Sun," and it suits her. She is just attractive, just intelligent and just old enough to be believable as someone who has been unlucky at love, the sort of woman we all know and adore who is undervalued by her potential dating pool. (I hate when they cast some fashion-model-pretty 22-year-old and expect us to believe she keeps getting dumped.) Between Diane Lane and Joan Allen, I think I'm developing a thing for older women.

And Cusack -- well, who doesn't love John Cusack? He's counting on it; this role is not substantially different from the one he played in "Serendipity"; apparently, this is what he does now. Which is fine with me if he keeps turning in sharp, funny performances like this one. He and Lane work together as if they'd been scene partners for years. Indeed, the dialogue in general is a notch above the norm, snappy and tight and remarkably unlike the drivel these things usually have. It's not enough to change my mind about rom-coms, but I'm glad to see a decent one now and then.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=12657&reviewer=247
originally posted: 07/29/05 00:36:18
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

11/30/06 SabresFanatic Disappointed. Needed more of Cusack and Plummer 3 stars
7/09/06 Marty i liked it and i don't know why. diane lane's hot maybe? 4 stars
5/07/06 Diane Perkins boring, love diane and john but neither very good in this movie 2 stars
5/02/06 Ashley Hinz I won't watch this again. What a waste of Plummer and Cusack. 2 stars
1/29/06 Lily It's just one big "perfectmatch.com" commercial. 2 stars
12/25/05 zhivago john cusack is incapable of making a bad movie 5 stars
11/10/05 Jinx This movie stinks. Too much sex and innuendo. 1 stars
10/29/05 Rover Must hate contemporary "romantic" "comedies"! 1 stars
10/28/05 Mrs. Casey Donovan Diane Lane is an obnoxious skank. I'd like to stuff scorpions up her rectum. 1 stars
10/28/05 Allison Lafferty Anyone else notice "heroine" is an unlikeble self-centered brat? 1 stars
10/28/05 Jenny Tullwartz If it's really yourself you're mad at, break your own damn glasses, for pete's sake! 1 stars
10/15/05 Aaron Terrible. 1 stars
10/12/05 eddiejohns You must really love dogs to love this movie. It bites! 2 stars
10/11/05 Josh Swanson Total garbage. Not worth my time or money...got in for a free screening...no wasted money! 1 stars
10/06/05 Don Your review is so spot on its funny, but I still loved the movie; Im in love with DL 4 stars
10/06/05 Susan I knew it! yucky! 1 stars
9/28/05 Sarah was ere my name is sarah darymple i loooveee emaweise 1 stars
9/21/05 karen romantic 4 stars
8/08/05 jada i'm just embarrassed for John Cusack, cheesy & hit every awful cliche, hated it 1 stars
8/04/05 ron abrams yawn. what a waste. 2 stars
7/30/05 Bonnie Roberts I wouldn't see it twice 2 stars
7/29/05 Naka Ungh. No. 2 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  29-Jul-2005 (PG-13)
  DVD: 20-Dec-2005



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast