Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.51

Awesome: 20.79%
Worth A Look40.59%
Just Average: 13.86%
Pretty Crappy: 18.81%
Sucks: 5.94%

10 reviews, 41 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Fortress, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

MFA by Jay Seaver

You Only Live Once by Jay Seaver

November (2017) by Jay Seaver

Friendly Beast by Jay Seaver

Foreigner, The (2017) by Jay Seaver

Tom of Finland by Rob Gonsalves

Happy Death Day by Jay Seaver

78/52: Hitchcock's Shower Scene by Jay Seaver

Death Note: Light Up the New World by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Constant Gardener, The
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Mel Valentin

"Likely to make this reviewer's yearly top-10 list."
4 stars

On the surface, "The Constant Gardener," based on a bestselling John Le Carré novel and directed by Brazilian filmmaker Fernando Meirelles ("City of God"), is a political thriller that takes its themes, context, and subtext from the complex issues and controversial actions surrounding “Big Pharma,” multinational, pharmaceutical companies driven, like all corporations, by the desire to maximize profits, often at the expense of human lives. Billions of dollars in profits are at stake, compelling alliances between government leaders and pharmaceutical companies. Such complex, interrelated issues of corporate responsibility, government inaction/action in support of corporate malfeasance, however, are difficult to address within the confines and conventions of the political thriller or a limited running time.

Set and filmed in Kenya, The Constant Gardener opens with Justin Quayle (Ralph Fiennes), a mid-level, middle-aged British diplomat and his wife, Tessa (Rachel Weisz), an aid worker, standing on a tarmac, exchanging pleasantries before she departs for a fact-finding mission. The scene ends as the bright sunlight whites out the screen, segueing into a shot of a jeep turned on its side near a seashore, a wheel spinning ominously. The news of Tessa’s death ripples outward, initially affecting Justin’s close friend, Sandy Woodrow (Danny Huston), a fellow diplomat, and Justin himself. The Constant Gardener then moves backwards in time, covering Justin and Tessa’s first meeting at a lecture (Tessa denounces Britain’s controversial involvement in the invasion and occupation of Iraq, followed by a mass walkout by the other attendees).

From that shaky beginning of political differences (and age, as Justin’s position in the diplomatic hierarchy suggests a significant age disparity), Justin and Tessa’s relationship turns romantic. Assigned to Nairobi, Kenya, Justin settles into a life of comfort and complacency, spending his leisure time in his beloved garden. Tessa’s political activism, however, takes her to the slums, where, in addition to witnessing abject poverty, she discovers that a multinational pharmaceutical company is running clinical trials on the poor forced to participate in them. Tessa gathers information with the help of a Belgian-Congolese doctor, Arnold Bluhm (Hubert Koundé), whose continuing presence in Tessa’s life raises Justin’s anxieties and, of course, his jealousy.

Unfortunately, it’s when The Constant Gardener shifts its focus permanently from Tessa’s work among the poor to Justin’s globetrotting investigation, complete with obligatory scenic stops (e.g., London, Amsterdam, Berlin, and back to Kenya) that the storyline begins to lose momentum (likely due to the compression necessary in adapting a novel to the limited running time). Despite Justin’s newfound political activism and repeated attempts to hide his identity, another issue with the storyline surfaces: the villains (mostly faceless) are always one step of him, raising the obvious question as to why Justin is allowed to live. The scenes where Justin locates key sources, obtains the next, necessary piece of information that will unlock the mystery, flow by in rapid, perfunctory fashion, often referring to unfamiliar or less familiar off screen characters. Justin’s investigation also gets a helpful hand from a conveniently placed hacker/computer genius, Tessa’s young cousin, who accesses her e-mail and electronic files with near-absurd ease (he guesses her password on the first try).

More importantly, Fernando Meirelles and his screenwriter Jeffrey Caine, in adapting Le Carré’s novel, occasionally takes a heavy-handed approach to the political material, allowing his characters to turn dialogue scenes into speeches about the evils of multinational corporations, government malfeasance, and, of course, the dangers they pose. In an otherwise intelligent political thriller, Meirelles and Caine could and should have trusted their audience to decipher the subtext for themselves, especially as Justin’s investigation into Tessa’s death neatly dovetails with his efforts to learn more the secrets she refused to share with him (ostensibly to protect him). Meirelles and Caine also shortchange the scenes meant to establish Justin and Tessa's romantic relationship, making Justin’s growing obsession less likely to create audience sympathy.

Style wise, Meirelles employs a desaturated color palette, frequent handheld camerawork (a holdover from City of God), and white outs or blur outs as transitions between scenes, all of which help in creating a sense of immediacy and urgency to the unfolding storyline and Justin’s personal, emotional journey from bourgeois complacency (and obsessive gardener) to radical activism. Meirelles also succeeds in eliciting sympathy for his characters, especially Justin (ably played by Ralph Fiennes, perfectly cast as tortured romantic) and Tessa (Rachel Weisz, persuasive as a committed social activist). Fiennes, in his introductory scene where he learns of Tessa's death, and, later, when he returns to London alone, conveys the overwhelming grief of his character with the simplest of facial and body movements (a credit to his ability). It's in these quiet moments, of a grief-stricken Justin or in the all-too-brief idyllic scenes between Justin and Tessa that The Constant Gardener's real emotional impact lies.

Regardless of "The Constant Gardener's" commercial or critical prospects, however, one other point is worth mentioning. Given the subject matter and the producers’ undiluted, impassioned criticism of the corporate-government nexus, it's abundantly clear that no mainstream, Hollywood studio would have financed "The Constant Gardener" (it was produced independently).

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=12868&reviewer=402
originally posted: 08/31/05 01:09:01
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/14/17 morris campbell gripping good film 4 stars
3/12/16 roberta wiener compelling, gripping,a smart person's film.. Fiennes" acting is amazing and subtle. 5 stars
4/26/12 tan hongtao a movie about a crasy bitch who lost her mind, 1 stars
8/07/10 PAUL SHORTT TENSE, INVOLVING THRILLER WITH SOME GOOD PERFORMANCES 4 stars
3/18/09 Chaka Khan I dont understand the rave about this movie, not believable in any way and brutally boring 2 stars
11/08/08 mr.mike The central mystery isn't all that compelling, Fiennes and a satisfying ending compensate 4 stars
5/20/07 action movie fan BORING STORY COMSTANTLY DULL 1 stars
5/15/07 mb Excellent Movie ... useless ending. 4 stars
5/11/07 R.W. Welch A shade overdone, but still intriguing conspiracy flick. B- 4 stars
3/28/07 fools♫gold been-done-before-and-better "drama/action", like Bulletproof Monk, but more boring. 2 stars
2/10/07 Mystic Dark, brooding and will haunt for along time. The story of our times.... 5 stars
11/13/06 Ryan_A Fiennes is fantastic. 4 stars
11/05/06 zaw WTF! This movie is for people who like to complicate their lives! Real life is not!!! 1 stars
11/01/06 Patsyc A good movie. It has a very good storyline. 4 stars
9/01/06 MP Bartley Angry, and the emotion of it creeps up on you. Fiennes is brilliant. 4 stars
7/31/06 Eden Despite the storyline, its a kinda bland film; completely forgetable 2 stars
5/19/06 Simon Doesn't quite have a knockout punch as a moviegoer would like, but its sincerity is legit 4 stars
5/06/06 daveyt enjoyable, didn't mind the time lapse plot, jerky cinematography and slow pace! 4 stars
4/29/06 millersxing A well-intentioned, overbearing snoozer. 2 stars
4/22/06 Phil M. Aficionado In a few days it will blend into a dozen others I've seen, full of incongruous twists 3 stars
3/31/06 Nobody BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING!!!! 1 stars
3/11/06 Josh Standlee Fact: Ralph Feinnes is an emotionless android. 2 stars
3/06/06 Annie G Interesting overall, but seriously do people think drug companies have this much power? 4 stars
2/27/06 Serious Critic !0 Osrcar noms but still this is ciold war propaganda 4 stars
2/24/06 Indrid Cold A leisurely-paced thriller with more intimate romantic scenes than actual thrills. 4 stars
2/09/06 helen bradley A story that lingers well after leaving the flick, great acting all round and photograohy 5 stars
1/25/06 john bale Timely and disturbing thriller which must raise concern about the ethics of some Companies. 5 stars
1/21/06 Simon Very-very well done. Well-developed characters, unforced social awareness, smart dialogue 5 stars
1/16/06 Agent Sands Intelligent, well-directed film. 4 stars
1/12/06 middle earth characters with soul, but film event driven, who are these people? 4 stars
12/13/05 What's the matter with you people? What a complete waste of time! Weisz and Fiennes should be shot down for this! 1 stars
10/05/05 Taylor Fladgate Can you say "Oscar!"? This film will get at least 5 nods. 5 stars
9/28/05 Olga Reprintseva awakening and beautiful 4 stars
9/16/05 Suzz excellent performances but just your average thriller otherwise 3 stars
9/15/05 Jake I walked into this film expecting a great movie. An hour later, I walked disappointed. 2 stars
9/12/05 susan great 5 stars
9/07/05 Koitus Didn't care for "out of time" sequencing; many "false" leads provided, too... 2 stars
9/05/05 Ionicera great performances and love story 4 stars
9/04/05 Melina remembering the movie, brings tears to my eyes again - definitely worth seeing! 5 stars
9/04/05 Bob Siesholtz This was a horrible movie. It was slow moving and boring. Drug companies are evil. Thanks 1 stars
8/31/05 B.Blackbrain It was like a documentary by Alfred Hitchcock. Best movie I've seen all year. 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  31-Aug-2005 (R)
  DVD: 10-Jan-2006

UK
  N/A

Australia
  17-Nov-2005




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast