Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.02

Awesome: 11.49%
Worth A Look: 18.39%
Just Average40.23%
Pretty Crappy: 20.69%
Sucks: 9.2%

10 reviews, 27 user ratings



World Trade Center
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by David Cornelius

"Touching, but all too disappointing."
3 stars

Oliver Stone’s “World Trade Center” is a sharply made yet surprisingly mundane work that manages to reduce the horrors of September 11, 2001, to movie-of-the-week fluff. There are many powerful moments to be found here, but their impact is often diluted by weaker scenes that belong in the work of a lesser filmmaker.

Where is the Oliver Stone we know so well, the Oliver Stone afraid to plow ahead with energy and passion for his messages? “World Trade Center” is a film with so very little so say; it observes a few of-the-moment ideas, but is otherwise commentary-free. It is a movie that is cautionary with its every move, so eager to tell someone else’s story that the filmmaker’s own voice gets lost along the way.

That story, as compiled by first-time screenwriter Andrea Berloff, is that of two survivors of the WTC attack, and of those connected to them. It is easy to understand why this story was chosen to be told - it provides a happy ending to one of the nation’s worst days, allowing us all to cling on to whatever hope we can find in such a bleak event. Perhaps this is a response to those who cry “too soon!” upon hearing word of a 9/11 movie. Unlike “United 93” (and its made-for-cable counterpart, “Flight 93”), this kind of silver-lining story can be made as an appeasement, as if to say while it may be too soon to deal with the darkness of the day, the time is always right to discuss one of the rare brighter sides.

In doing so, however, Stone and Berloff reduce the entire day to a generic made-for-TV feel-gooder; replace cops trapped under the rubble of Tower Two with, say, miners trapped after a cave-in or a baby rescued from a hole in the ground, and you still wind up with more or less the same movie. Berloff’s script provides a simple set-up, followed by the tragedy, the initial efforts to survive, cutaways to worried loved ones (reduced to melodramatic hand-wringing), more survival efforts, the rescue mission, and an epilogue which wraps everything up neatly. ((Not to be misread, we even get too-cheap narration in the final frames reminding us how we saw “the best and worst” of humanity that day, thus underlining the point with a thick magic marker.)

With Stone at the helm, this is all competently made - indeed, many scenes, especially late in the film, are honestly powerful. And there’s something to admire about a movie that dares reduce the most famous, most analyzed day in modern American history to the viewpoint of a handful of Port Authority cops, folks who never even knew the other tower was ever hit. The earliest scenes have a grace about them, as we experience that September morning through their eyes alone. Confusion, fear, and bravery mix together into something special, and it comes across as a welcome tribute to the men and women who died trying to help others. We know they’re scared without anyone ever saying a word, which makes us admire their actions even more.

For a good chunk of the film, we stick with this group of cops (led by Patrol Sgt. John McLoughlin, as played by Nicolas Cage, one of the few recognizable faces in the cast), and it seems as if this approach might just work. But then we begin cutting away - to the wives, to concerned citizens across the country, even to cheap stock footage of people around the globe watching news reports of the towers falling.

It’s here that “World Trade Center” begins to fail as a movie, here where Berloff’s screenplay abandons its single-perspective notions and instead turns to ham-fisted formula. The scenes with Maria Bello and Maggie Gyllenhaal as two nervous spouses are rarely given the opportunity to affect us on the same level as the cops’ story. It has its moments (how to deal with upset children, the need to do something to take one’s mind off the agony of waiting), but the overall framing of these scenes is nothing you couldn’t find in a movie produced for Lifetime. These away stories make sense from a storytelling perspective - you can’t just show guys trapped under rubble for two hours, can you? - but in finding a way to work around this problem, Berloff and Stone take the easiest, laziest way out, providing us with hackneyed material.

Most curious about the cutaway portions of the story are the scenes that show us folks not related in any way to the cops. We follow the path of Marine Staff Sergeant Karnes (Michael Shannon) as he leaves his day job to help join the search mission, and this makes sense, as it provides a little more depth to this rescue story. But what of the guy in Sheboygan, whom we see for a few seconds reacting to the network news, then only see one more time, at film’s end, handing out hot dogs at Ground Zero? Obviously the intent is to show how the news of the attacks affected many Americans, yet these are the only two stories we get of this, and only one of them has any actual bearing on the plot. The other is filler so awkwardly inserted into the story that it sticks out like a sore thumb. Were more scenes edited out somewhere?

And yet, despite all of these problems, I’m more than willing to give “World Trade Center” a recommendation, as it does make its way through the shakier bits to come off as a highly moving piece. The cast - which also includes Michael Pena, Jay Hernandez, and Frank Whaley, among others - brings a somber reality to the proceedings, and Stone’s masterful direction allows the story to impact us on its own terms.

Would we have been better off with a more Oliver Stone-esque movie? I’m not sure. While I’m glad to see Stone respecting those whose lives he’s representing here instead of allowing his own politics to get in the way, I’m also certain that had we gotten “Oliver Stone’s 9/11,” there’d be a lot more discussion going on, and for the better. As it is, “World Trade Center” moves us but then fades from memory all too quickly. From a filmmaker famous (infamous?) for having so much to say, to see so little said with a movie centering on such an important topic is quite a letdown. “World Trade Center” is moving, tender, and disappointingly shallow.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=14951&reviewer=392
originally posted: 08/08/06 22:14:01
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

1/17/10 babette 911 was an inside job. 1 stars
5/28/08 PAUL SHORTT A VISUALLY STUNNING TRIBUTE TO LIVES LOST IN TRAGEDY 4 stars
9/08/07 mr.mike had no problem with it 4 stars
6/09/07 Danielle Ophelia Oliver Stone discovers Norman Rockwell noir, and it ain't pretty. 2 stars
12/22/06 John Z Good show, even though you kinda know the ending. 4 stars
12/14/06 action movie fan decent 9/11 story-at least stone didn,t rewrite history here 3 stars
12/14/06 The Deadly Assassin not bad, but can't compare with United 93 4 stars
12/10/06 Wendy Straw Awesome!!! 5 stars
11/24/06 MP Bartley Utterly forgettable, trite, limp and sentimental. 2 stars
10/15/06 William Goss Admirable as a reenactment, but this feel-good take grows increasingly arbitrary in 2nd hr. 3 stars
10/10/06 paula a slap in the face to the deceased of 9/11 1 stars
9/25/06 Anthony Feor Why must Oliver Stone ruin history? 2 stars
9/04/06 Sir Spam-a-lot Arrrgh, stop profiting on tragedy :-P (I saw it for free, BTW so no profit for me) 2 stars
8/23/06 Mohobbit This film reminds us of the hero's of that day,the cops and firefighters. Good work Oliver 5 stars
8/22/06 Brian C Much better than I ever would have guessed 5 stars
8/17/06 KAREN MATLOCK unexpectedly good 4 stars
8/17/06 Tiffany good 4 stars
8/17/06 Pn. Love ya Ollie, but, well, "United 93" was awesome... 4 stars
8/16/06 kristin it was very poorly directed and put together. at times it was even funny and quite random. 2 stars
8/15/06 seenit See it - not the usual hollywood hype would have been better w/ unknowns 4 stars
8/15/06 Sue D Great - a MUST see for everyone! 5 stars
8/14/06 Mike V A bit too much of a "TV movie of the week" feel 3 stars
8/13/06 y wasting money 2 stars
8/13/06 ES Heart tugging 4 stars
8/12/06 Mark So-so 3 stars
8/10/06 yo momma cinematic masturbation for the republican set 3 stars
8/09/06 Elisa Giro Very good. 4 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  09-Aug-2006 (PG-13)
  DVD: 12-Dec-2006

UK
  29-Sep-2006

Australia
  05-Oct-2006




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast