Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.81

Awesome: 14.58%
Worth A Look: 16.67%
Just Average: 22.92%
Pretty Crappy27.08%
Sucks: 18.75%

4 reviews, 24 user ratings



Bug (2007)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by brianorndorf

"When Lionsgate wants to hide a film, we should take the hint"
3 stars

“Bug” is not a horror film. The releasing studio, Lionsgate, has tried to cloud the fact that this thesis on paranoia and psychosis contains little in the way of jolts and terror by marketing the film as “Saw V.” I feel sorry for the gorehounds who skip merrily into this picture, only to be confronted with two characters simply cowering on the floor for 100 minutes.

Agnes (Ashley Judd) is a desperate woman with an abusive creep for an ex-husband (Harry Connick Jr.) and enough personal demons for two lifetimes. Drowning her considerable sorrows in drink and drugs, she’s introduced to Peter (Michael Shannon) and the two hit it off. Peter is a strange, withdrawn man, but Agnes finds compassion from the stranger and the two bond immediately. During their first night together, Peter discovers microscopic bugs in the seedy hotel room, opening his reservoir of lethal fixation as he traces the invisible insects into his bloodstream, slowly convincing Agnes into believing that their bodies are infested with these tiny agents of the government.

Adapted by Tracy Letts from his own 1996 stage play, “Bug” is an effective piece of unease, using the compact space of a filthy hotel room to incubate delirium and nightmarish displays of loyalty and insanity. What pops the polluted bubble of the film version is the thought that perhaps this war on reason was at its best on the stage, where the rougher, flamboyant edges of the narrative had a more horrific effect.

Legendary director William Friedkin (“The Exorcist”) seems an apt choice for this material. Well versed in dramatizing unfathomable despair and damage, Friedkin lends “Bug” a sensible amount of air. The film is not a looping ride of scares, but a slow build, using a good 60 minutes of running time to understand the characters and their insecurities before he lets the premise drop off into hell as scripted. “Bug” is a low-budget picture and it shows at times, but it has a tenacity to it, or at least a defiance, to follow its own pace. Friedkin shows more patience here than most directors would.

The question I have is if this play needed the cinematic treatment at all. While gripping in faint ways, “Bug” loses its balance at several points during the story because the camera is in too close to the action, pinpointing the mania of the concept rather than allowing it to sneak up behind the audience. The stage also allows for the actors to expand on their bug-infested performance tics without the unforgiving eye of the camera revealing a limitation of talent. God bless Judd and Shannon, who play at the tempo needed, but once the infestation reaches a frenzied point, their displays of irritation are best left for a more forgiving distance.

“Bug” isn’t interested in a fever pitch; another reason for horror fans to readjust their antennae before walking into the theater. The film has moments of nastiness and bloodletting, but it’s more concerned with actorly monologues and psychological snowballing in the final moments, while also pulling governmental conspiracies tied to various homeland terrorists and cult leaders out of its behind at the last minute. It’s an exhausting experience that overstays its welcome, but “Bug” is unique in its priorities; a quality Lionsgate should’ve been eager to celebrate rather than keep away from online press and accurate promotion.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=15017&reviewer=404
originally posted: 05/25/07 18:04:48
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2006 Fantastic Fest For more in the 2006 Fantastic Fest series, click here.

User Comments

4/04/13 David Hollingsworth Very underrated, and disturbing! 5 stars
11/03/09 avrille alinaalbum com 2 stars
5/25/09 mr.mike It was dreadful. 2 stars
9/02/08 Shaun Wallner This one was kinda boring. 2 stars
7/10/08 drdanny Entomo-Clausto-riffic! 4 stars
11/21/07 mike really dumb and u can only laugh at the stupidity in the end. very bad movie 1 stars
11/17/07 Jeff Anderson Like THE EXORCIST it's nerve-racking, but it's tense. Judd & esp. Shannon are fantastic! 4 stars
10/24/07 Lynn overacting big time!!!!!! 1 stars
10/07/07 WeeToddDidd Blah! Only worth it to see Ashley show hes stuff 2 stars
10/01/07 Angelica Message of all AJ movies could be wholly conveyed just by"Men Suck" tattooed on her forhead 1 stars
9/23/07 Jason Ashley Judd is naked alot...enough said!! Her nudity is the only thing worth wild in this. 2 stars
8/06/07 CiCONDeck I Laughed Because there were only 3 people in the thearte. Cried becasue ia wasted $7 on it 1 stars
6/26/07 damalc probably a lot better on stage than on screen 3 stars
6/15/07 William Goss Stage adaptation boasts strong performances, even stranger plot developments. 3 stars
6/05/07 kayjay2323 The audience was laughing hysterically. Need I say more? 1 stars
6/05/07 Ian utterly terrible 1 stars
6/02/07 dmitry samarov UGH!!! 2 stars
6/02/07 khkrinzman horrendous, pretentious, banal---the insanity of bug is sitting through the whole thing. 1 stars
5/31/07 Amit well, the movie was pretty good and the acting of stars was good enogh 3 stars
5/30/07 VENKATESH RAO Good Performances 3 stars
5/29/07 Harriett Holmes The explosion was a metaphor for what happened to my $9.00 1 stars
5/27/07 Blizz I agree with Brian. 2 stars
5/27/07 Brian Mckay Good performances, but meh. Two crazy people in a room for 2 hours = tedious 3 stars
5/25/07 RKM Someone get the RAID! Bug sucks!! 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  25-May-2007 (R)
  DVD: 25-Sep-2007

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast