Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
1.71

Awesome: 0%
Worth A Look: 4.17%
Just Average: 0%
Pretty Crappy58.33%
Sucks: 37.5%

3 reviews, 6 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Shape of Water, The by Jay Seaver

I, Tonya by Rob Gonsalves

Wonder Wheel by Peter Sobczynski

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Rob Gonsalves

Swindlers, The by Jay Seaver

Oro (Gold) by Jay Seaver

Disaster Artist, The by Peter Sobczynski

Explosion by Jay Seaver

Lucky (2017) by Rob Gonsalves

Breadwinner, The by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Seeker: The Dark is Rising, The
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by brianorndorf

"Seek other family entertainment"
2 stars

Between now and February three movie studios have armed themselves with family-oriented epics to sweep up whatever coin has been left behind by the likes of the “Narnia” franchise and especially “Harry Potter.” It’s an awfully transparent way to conduct business, but hey, that’s Hollywood.

On his 14th birthday, Will Stanton (Alexander Ludwig) finds he’s the savior of the universe; a boy entrusted with preserving the forces of the Light (including Ian McShane and Frances Conroy) against the growing persistence of the Dark (led by Christopher Eccleston). Uncomfortable with his new powers, Will hunts for special signs and artifacts to help the cause, bending time to achieve his quest to become the great power on which so many are depending to help banish the Dark forever.

The first “alternate world” production to reach theaters is “The Seeker” (the others being December’s “Golden Compass” and February’s “Spiderwick Chronicles”), an adaptation of the popular 70’s fantasy books written by Susan Cooper. Not having had the pleasure of reading the source material, “Seeker” holds some high-flying aspirations to become a snappy fantastical franchise, yet a majority of it was lost on me. I can only imagine I will not be alone in that reaction.

The ultimate question is, was the movie purposefully made into a blur to play directly into the pockets of the fans, or do we chalk this up to standard-issue directorial incompetence? I vote the latter, since helmer David L. Cunningham doesn’t exhibit much skill gluing sequences together in “Seeker.” Cunningham is thirsting for a more visually spastic direction, pumping up the light shows and overtaxing smoke machines to give “Seeker” otherworldly menace. Frankly, it looks more like Duran Duran’s “Wild Boys” video.

On one side we have a director with a sweet tooth for frame clutter and an exasperating reliance on clichéd artifice; on the other side, a script that requires a PHD in “Dark is Rising” backstory, which pulls the film in a far more lethargic direction. The exposition is piled dangerously high in “Seeker,” threatening to suffocate the film under the mass of characters and histories the film fails to properly introduce. Watching the feature stop itself over and over to carefully explain just what in the hell is going on is tiring, making me reflect fondly on how the “Harry Potter” films were executed to Muggles like me. It doesn’t have to be a flawless immersion, just engaging. “Seeker” doesn’t invite the audience to participate in the fun. Instead the feature drones on about events and people we barely understand in the first place.

Also baffling are the multitude of twists and turns in the script. Most of the big reveals of “Seeker” can be telegraphed a mile away, but is this in service of the younger viewers or does the film truly believe in its lackluster misdirection?

“Seeker” soon sputters off into a showdown of Light and Dark for the future of the world. Heavy, huh? Unfortunately most of the dramatic execution is left to Alexander Ludwig, who isn’t the most striking onscreen personality. I kept hoping McShane would shove the boy aside and take “Seeker” for a spin with his enchanting Shakespearian acting tics, matching the apocalyptic tone of the finale assault more comfortably than a skinny blonde teenage acting novice. That drastic (and needed) change of focus never comes to fruition.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=15562&reviewer=404
originally posted: 10/05/07 02:38:20
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

11/30/10 PAUL SHORTT UNINVOLVING AND FORMULAIC 1 stars
12/14/08 g Complete abomination to the novel 1 stars
10/06/08 Cat Smith Utter crap, and very little do to with the actual books. 1 stars
2/03/08 Advantus Little scary for the kids but a lot of fun for the adults. Good Light vs Dark scenario. 4 stars
12/13/07 William Goss Can't help but play like a hodge-podge of every other fantasy tale ever told. 2 stars
10/09/07 susan This movie bears no resemblance to what was a wonderful series of books. 2 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  05-Oct-2007 (PG)
  DVD: 18-Mar-2008

UK
  19-Oct-2007

Australia
  04-Oct-2007




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast