Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2

Awesome: 1.96%
Worth A Look: 17.65%
Just Average: 3.92%
Pretty Crappy: 31.37%
Sucks45.1%

6 reviews, 15 user ratings


Latest Reviews

I, Tonya by Rob Gonsalves

Wonder Wheel by Peter Sobczynski

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Rob Gonsalves

Swindlers, The by Jay Seaver

Oro (Gold) by Jay Seaver

Disaster Artist, The by Peter Sobczynski

Explosion by Jay Seaver

Lucky (2017) by Rob Gonsalves

Breadwinner, The by Jay Seaver

Endless, The by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Hills Have Eyes 2, The
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"Eyes, yes. Brain, no."
2 stars

Huh. I said in my review of last year's "The Hills Have Eyes" that among its problems was that its characters were too likable and genuine, making it almost unendurable to watch them tortured and slaughtered later in the film. Now the sequel has remedied that problem by making all the characters combative, stupid, and vulgar, and yet it's STILL not a good movie.

The right combination, I suppose, would be to have the characters as loathsome as they are in "The Hills Have Eyes II," then to dispatch them as horrifically and distastefully as the nice folks in the first movie were. That might give us some kind of creepy pleasure, seeing people we hate killed by other people we hate.

But this sequel, written by Wes Craven and his son Jonathan and directed by German music-video director Martin Weisz, lacks the ghoulish imagination that can make a slasher flick entertaining. These people get bumped off, sure, and the survivors get some revenge against their attackers, yeah. But there's no fun in it. There's no wit in the dialogue, no surprise in the methods of death (a disappointing number are simply shot), and there's a rape scene that's ugly and gratuitous.

The characters, morons even by slasher-flick standards, are National Guard trainees who stop to deliver supplies to the real Army in the New Mexico desert, only to find that the Army guys have all disappeared. They get a radio call from a survivor, and a rescue party is assembled. Two privates are left at the camp while the other six soldiers and their commanding officer head up into the hills to find the injured Army dude, and also to be killed, one at a time, by the mutants who live there. A lot of scenes are thus set in the dark caves, recalling the vastly superior thriller "The Descent."

For reasons unknown, the National Guard trainees all hate each other. The exception is that there are two women among them, and the guys sometimes pretend not to hate them long enough to flirt with them. But mostly, it's hate. Hate, aggression, and defensiveness. Witness this exchange of dialogue between two of the men:

ONE SOLDIER: You're not Rambo resurrected! (Meaning: "You're not the ultimate soldier you think you are!")

ANOTHER SOLDIER: You can Rambo resurrect my b***s!

Now, come on. What does that even mean? It's something a violent, stupid person would say just to be quarrelsome. The first half-hour of the movie is full of that kind of thing, up until they started getting killed, at which point they (mostly) stop fighting and start peeing their pants instead.

I am not going to tell you the characters' names, or the names of the actors who play them.

More than anything, "The Hills Have Eyes II" feels like an exercise, not a real film. It's a chance for a new director to go through the mechanics of making a torture-porn hackfest -- where to put the camera, how to sever the limbs, when to show the killers' faces -- without bothering to fill in the details. Unfortunately, this dry run has been put into theaters, unrefined and unwatchable, and I have watched it. The good thing is, you don't have to.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=15600&reviewer=247
originally posted: 03/26/07 05:49:39
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

1/07/14 Martin Horrible writing, acting, story. Great gore, action. Really hot blonde. 3 stars
8/25/12 roscoe a horror flick that's more of a action flick. that's wrong 2 stars
1/04/10 art HORRIBLE,JUST LIKE THE 1977 original,and that 20006 REMAKE! 1 stars
6/20/09 Yahel I was inpressed with Daniella Alonso, she lives in my building 4 stars
1/14/09 Shaun Wallner Friiggin Awesome!! 5 stars
1/06/09 FrankNFurter Yuck!I need a hot shower with a loofah after seeing this gutter-trash. 1 stars
2/16/08 ben dover fucking wank 1 stars
12/17/07 Thomas Pacheco great sequal to a great original horror film 4 stars
10/24/07 art makes you wish you never saw part one 1 stars
9/13/07 Monday Morning The feelgood movie of the year! What year, I don't know... 2 stars
8/18/07 mr.mike not all that good 2 stars
4/03/07 Summersweet207 i only liked the first one because of the gore 3 stars
3/30/07 Mike Similar to the descent but better! Lighten up and have fun critics! 4 stars
3/28/07 becky What can I say? Cannibals made by radiation...? 2 stars
3/24/07 irbear Total waste of time!!!! 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  23-Mar-2007 (R)
  DVD: 17-Jul-2007

UK
  30-Mar-2007 (18)
  DVD: 30-Jul-2007

Australia
  31-Oct-2007 (R)
  DVD: 31-Oct-2007




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast