Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.34

Awesome: 9.43%
Worth A Look: 3.77%
Just Average: 3.77%
Pretty Crappy77.36%
Sucks: 5.66%

6 reviews, 17 user ratings


Latest Reviews

I, Tonya by Rob Gonsalves

Wonder Wheel by Peter Sobczynski

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Rob Gonsalves

Swindlers, The by Jay Seaver

Oro (Gold) by Jay Seaver

Disaster Artist, The by Peter Sobczynski

Explosion by Jay Seaver

Lucky (2017) by Rob Gonsalves

Breadwinner, The by Jay Seaver

Endless, The by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Wolfman, The (2010)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by brianorndorf

"Its editorial confusion is worse than its bite"
2 stars

“The Wolfman” endured a rough journey from production to the big screen, with numerous reshoots, heavy editorial attention, and a slew of missed released dates. The fractured history of the film’s formation is easily viewed onscreen. A mangled, short-sheeted stab at reanimating a horror icon, “The Wolfman” is a mess; it’s a poorly-stitched, overthought, ear-splitting bungle of a picture, dragging a few normally trustworthy filmmaking professionals down with it.

Hearing of his brother’s brutal murder at the hands of a wild beast, Lawrence Talbot (Benicio Del Toro, woefully miscast) has returned to his family estate in Blackmoor to investigate, reuniting with his estranged father, John (a sleepwalking Anthony Hopkins), and consoling Gwen (Emily Blunt), his brother’s fiancée. During an attack by the vicious creature, Lawrence is bitten, soon cursed to become a Wolfman with every full moon. Called in to thwart the growing monster threat is Inspector Aberline (Hugo Weaving), who suspects Lawrence of evildoing when more bodies begin to pile up. Caught between the urges of his new animal instincts and his developing feelings for Gwen, Lawrence is forced to confront his savagery, which can only be stopped by true love or the taste of a silver bullet.

Movies spin out of control all the time. It’s the nature of Hollywood, with all of its numerous idiotic opinions and positions of ruthless power. But how did Universal Studios, the birthplace of horror for goodness sake, screw up “The Wolfman?” It’s seems a simple enough recipe: a Wolfman, unattainable love, a couple of full moons, and the long arm of the law. Boom, done. Bake until crisp, serves millions.

This “Wolfman” is a more complex endeavor. At least it once was, before Universal wrapped their paws around the picture, shaving it down to a 100-minute-long highlight reel of whatever Andrew Kevin Walker and David Self dreamed up in their screenplays. “The Wolfman” burns through its story in a hurry, eager to arrive at the bone-cracking transformation sequences to give chiller fans what they crave. Trouble is, the plot appears to be a heavily considered meditation on the dual nature of man and hostile familial devotion, making Lawrence a tortured soul cursed to ride out his worst nightmare of murder, carried away by his brutal prison of lycanthropy. The finished film only lightly touches on Lawrence’s curse and John’s cruelty, pushing aside coherent characterizations to make room for bloodshed and the business of being hairy.

“The Wolfman” isn’t an action-packed picture, with only a small corner of the run time set aside to watch Lawrence rip bodies in half or snack on his victims. What’s here is memorably extreme, and the picture is certainly at its most virile when showcasing the Wolfman rampage, using a mix of outstanding make-up effects and lesser CG-enhanced monster mayhem, which assumes a major role in the transformation sequences. The film earns its R-rating with images of limb-snatching carnage, but most, if not all of these money shots are over before they receive a chance to sink in. Director Joe Johnston pushes the film along instead of lingering in the moment, which will surely disappoint monster movie fans looking for wall-to-wall Wolfman.

We’re left with a “Wolfman” that sprints from scene to scene, picking up the basic narrative information as it goes, but little else. John’s maliciousness is vague at best, the romance between Lawrence and Gwen far-fetched and scarcely developed, and the oddball Gypsy fortune telling (embodied by Geraldine Chaplin) that struggles to explain monster motives is half-baked and quickly scrubbed away. What’s left is a gorgeously photographed (by Shelly Johnson) picture of imposing moonlit danger and ornate Victorian production polish, but no energizing cohesiveness. “The Wolfman” feels like it’s been gutted and sewn back together, stripped down to the basics to appeal to the widest, least discriminating audience. It’s a lousy situation of bruised artistic accomplishment, leaving little in the film worthy of a rooftop howl.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=17542&reviewer=404
originally posted: 02/13/10 10:07:18
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

9/16/17 morris campbell good effects but the originals better 3 stars
11/06/10 Will Russell How much gore can you squeeze in 90 minutes? A lot if you completely remove a good story. 2 stars
7/09/10 bronson TOTAL CRAP!!! 1 stars
6/14/10 Pantheon Loved every minutes. Honours the original while bringing up to date. 4 stars
3/15/10 LP Quagmire No chain-saws, no hockey masks, just a good old-fashioned horror movie! Solid performances 5 stars
2/28/10 Durwood OK until it got to the two werewolves fighting; then it got corny. 3 stars
2/24/10 DK I actually thought it was a fun enough monster homage. Crappy CGI bear though 4 stars
2/20/10 Lenore Francois Good special effects, but weak dialogue & Del Toro is a miscast in this role. 2 stars
2/18/10 Robert Cunningham I am a fan of the old Universal movies, so I love it. 5 stars
2/17/10 Heide I love Benicio Del Toro! 5 stars
2/17/10 Danny Goode great movie 5 stars
2/17/10 Ryan How can you say the cinematography was awful? I thought the film looked amazing! 5 stars
2/15/10 Jaye Too many boring moments and too many stupid actions by the characters. Disappointing 2 stars
2/15/10 Apollo I am aso upset -- this stunk so bad 1 stars
2/13/10 action movie fan style over substance good production and effects but little suspense and no real scares 2 stars
2/13/10 Samuel Isaacs What could/should have been a good film, Fail's miserably. 2 stars
2/12/10 PAUL SHORTT NOT SCARY ENOUGH TO BE EXCITING NOR CAMPY ENOUGH TO BE AMUSING 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  12-Feb-2010 (R)
  DVD: 01-Jun-2010

UK
  N/A

Australia
  12-Feb-2010
  DVD: 01-Jun-2010




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast