Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.73

Awesome39.39%
Worth A Look: 24.24%
Just Average: 6.06%
Pretty Crappy: 30.3%
Sucks: 0%

4 reviews, 9 user ratings


Latest Reviews

I, Tonya by Rob Gonsalves

Wonder Wheel by Peter Sobczynski

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Rob Gonsalves

Swindlers, The by Jay Seaver

Oro (Gold) by Jay Seaver

Disaster Artist, The by Peter Sobczynski

Explosion by Jay Seaver

Lucky (2017) by Rob Gonsalves

Breadwinner, The by Jay Seaver

Endless, The by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Antichrist
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Rob Gonsalves

"Don't look now. No, really, DON'T look now."
5 stars

Lars Von Trier's "Antichrist" is a rarity: a great film that I will never, ever subject myself to again.

The physical and emotional anguish on display here has not been exaggerated. Von Trier has used a story of grief Willem Dafoe and Charlotte Gainsbourg as parents devastated by the loss of their toddler son as a jumping-off point for what I can only call gender horror. On a surface level, Antichrist is Don't Look Now for the torture-porn era. Many will be content to leave it at that, and I do not blame them, for to apply a close reading to such a painful and disagreeable work is to grant it longer passage in one's head than one really wants to allow. This movie hurts to watch and to think about.

Reporting from Cannes, where Antichrist got its share of boos and withering reviews, Roger Ebert broke out the religious metaphysics. The film, he theorized, unfolds in an alternate universe where Satan, not God, created the world. Therefore, the suffering the husband and wife (they are identified in the credits only as He and She) inflict on each other is par for the course in the movie's reality. There will doubtless be other readings. Nice try, but what Ebert and future critics might seek to do is to flee from the film into the safety and rationality of interpretation and symbology. Anything can be made palatable if you abstract it enough.

The wife is practically insane with grief and guilt the couple, you see, had been making passionate love when their little son climbed up onto a window and fell to his death. The husband is a therapist, and at first, encouraged by Dafoe's soft-spoken and tender performance, we think that surely he will understand her; surely he will help her through her torment. But she accuses him of arrogance he dismisses her psychiatrist as unseasoned and too quick to dump meds onto her pain. He may be right, or he may be jealous. She falls into anxious hysterics, and he deduces that her problem is fear. But fear of what? It would seem that the worst thing she could've imagined has already happened.

Without getting into spoilers, Antichrist appears to be a dread-ridden meditation on misogyny and its deranging effects on male and female alike. Von Trier may be looking in the mirror here: he has long been accused of making his screen women Emily Watson, Bjork, Nicole Kidman, Bryce Dallas Howard, and now Charlotte Gainsbourg suffer for the delectation of the art-house crowd. (Is it relevant that none of these actresses have been better than they were under Von Trier's pitiless tutelage? Sexist or not, Von Trier like David Lynch gives actresses roles they can hit out of the park.) The key here may be the subject of the wife's aborted thesis paper: "gynocide," or the systematic oppression, demonization and destruction of women over the centuries. The husband approaches the wife's pain with the poor hegemonic tools of "rationality," reducing her to a child by way of "games" and "role-playing" to break her out of her "fear." But what she fears can't be talked out in therapy. (Therapist = the rapist.)

Von Trier throws in many uncanny and bizarre touches, like "the three beggars" (pain, grief, despair) in the form of mutilated or self-mutilating forest animals. The husband takes the wife to "Eden," a cottage in the woods where she had gone the previous summer with their child, hoping to finish her paper. The cottage seems constantly attacked by nature: there's a steady hail of acorns thundering down onto the roof. The wind, in the wife's mind, becomes the breath of Satan. She is in hell, for reasons we will slowly gather. The rumbling, ominous soundtrack and occasional camera fixations (a slow zoom into a flower vase in a hospital room, for instance) recall Lynch, but elsewhere Von Trier uses his trademark handheld style and jump-cuts. The effect, as always with this provocateur, is to keep us unbalanced.

What does Von Trier feel about women? I don't know. He probably doesn't either, which is why he keeps making films about them. By showing them in extremis, he may hope to get at some sort of female truth. His women are insane because they exist in an insane system, and by lashing out violently, like an R.D. Laing construct, they become purified in their madness. Von Trier makes deadly serious psychodramas with complex heroines who alienate us because we're part of the system they're rejecting. In Antichrist, the gender conflict reaches a particularly excruciating pitch. It is true philosophical horror, hard to shake off and harder, I suspect, for many to justify.

But here we are retreating into interpretation. Is the film, past a certain point, meant to be taken literally? I doubt it. Are the things we're seeing actually happening? There comes a point in the narrative when we seem to be witnessing ancient hatreds and grievances acted out; the quotation marks around some of the events are almost visible. I've seen appalled lists of the various offenses to the flesh in Antichrist, but such a litany misses the point. It's a film of ideas, not shocks. It's also a nightmare movie, not subject to waking logic or the usual immediate, derisive response to challenging art. The film may have a maximalist meaning He and She are all men, all women or it may simply be a heightened emotional portrait of the aftermath of grief. Only Von Trier knows for sure, except I'm not sure he does.

The movie is a workout, definitely. It will be condemned, praised, argued about. It feels like Von Trier getting down to the distilled basics of what he's always been driving at it feels like a summing-up. It is also more frightening, of course, than most of the "horror movies" you snicker at in the multiplex. Those movies really just want to horse around, give you a good time, make you jump and laugh. "Antichrist" is the real deal.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=18732&reviewer=416
originally posted: 08/28/09 00:57:23
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2009 Festival de Cannes For more in the 2009 Festival de Cannes series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2009 Toronto International Film Festival For more in the 2009 Toronto International Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2009 Edinburgh International Film Festival For more in the 2009 Edinburgh International Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: Fantastic Fest 2009 For more in the Fantastic Fest 2009 series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2009 New York Film Festival For more in the 2009 New York Film Festival series, click here.
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2009 Chicago International Film Festival For more in the 2009 Chicago International Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

5/16/17 Louise Agree with Sobczynski. And not even a particularly memorable film. 2 stars
4/20/12 Marty tough to connect, as it should be for its subj matter. i like visceral, unfiltered aspect 3 stars
5/29/11 mr.mike My 1st Von Trier film, pretty much agree with orndorf. 4 stars
8/01/10 Miss Horror Beautifully filmed, but took forever to get to the shocking conclusion. Boring 2 stars
1/06/10 randy todger sick but entrancing 4 stars
11/14/09 FrankNFurter Misogynistic poo. A talking fox + penis cumming blood + clitorectomy = waste of time.Avoid! 2 stars
10/29/09 Butt A celebration of misogyny w/ full on camera self genital mutilation, exuiste cinematography 2 stars
10/29/09 matt nearly impenetrable, and too much shock for shocks sake. 3 stars
10/25/09 Man Out 6 Bucks Archetypes attempt transubstantiation in a Pantheist universe 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  23-Oct-2009 (NR)
  DVD: 09-Nov-2010

UK
  N/A (18)

Australia
  23-Oct-2009 (R)


Directed by
  Lars Von Trier

Written by
  Lars Von Trier

Cast
  Willem Dafoe
  Charlotte Gainsbourg



Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast