Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.52

Awesome: 15.15%
Worth A Look48.48%
Just Average: 12.12%
Pretty Crappy: 21.21%
Sucks: 3.03%

3 reviews, 15 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Star Wars: Episode VIII : The Last Jedi by Jay Seaver

Darkest Hour by Jay Seaver

Shape of Water, The by Jay Seaver

I, Tonya by Rob Gonsalves

Wonder Wheel by Peter Sobczynski

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri by Rob Gonsalves

Swindlers, The by Jay Seaver

Oro (Gold) by Jay Seaver

Disaster Artist, The by Peter Sobczynski

Explosion by Jay Seaver

subscribe to this feed


Possession (2002)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"The title is irrelevant. So is the movie, but it's pretty good."
4 stars

Neil LaBute's fourth film, "Possession," marks his entry into the ranks of mature Hollywood directors. His previous films ("In the Company of Men," "Your Friends and Neighbors" and "Nurse Betty") have been proficient and intelligent, but now he has combined his keen directorial vision with rich cinematography and lush scenery. Except for the presence of frat-boyish Aaron Eckhart, a fellow BYU grad who has appeared in each of LaBute's films, "Possession" looks every bit like the elegant English romantic drama it attempts to be.

In fairness, Eckhart does well here. His captain-of-the-football-team delivery suits his character, an American named Roland Mitchell who works in London as a research assistant to a professor of Victorian poetry. Roland stumbles across some relatively torrid letters written by Randolph Henry Ash, the 19th-century poet in whom his boss specializes. What's noteworthy is that Ash had a wife to whom he seemed completely devoted. Furthermore, the letters seem to be addressed to the poetess Christabel LaMotte, a devout lesbian. If Roland can prove this correspondence -- which no scholar has ever discovered before -- actually took place, it will rock the literary world. (Admittedly, the literary world is one that is easily rocked.)

He seeks out Dr. Maud Bailey (Gwyneth Paltrow), who is far prettier than her frumpy name and dowdy demeanor would suggest. She is a cold fish and an expert in Christabel LaMotte; surely combining these two worlds of knowledge can lead them to the bottom of the mystery. And surely a romance between the two researchers is also in the offing. How can it not be, with musty old manuscripts and gooey love poems at the center of their work?

Based on A.S. Byatt's novel and adapted by LaBute, David Henry Hwang and Laura Jones, the story plays out much like a mystery, with Roland and Maud finding clues and following leads that, in my opinion, often materialize too easily and conveniently.

It is all interspersed with scenes from Ash and LaMotte's lives, those roles being played by Jeremy Northam and Jennifer Ehle, respectively. A period piece only about those two would have been grand to watch, especially as played by such accomplished actors. Paltrow and Eckhart are very good as the modern-day researchers, but their romance seems obligatory. There is no indication that the 150-year-old affair they're studying led them, inspired them or brought them together; they just wound up together, the same as they would if they'd been working on any other project (at least in the world of movies, where co-workers of the opposite sex always fall in love).

Considering this is a film about people doing research, it's amazing how well LaBute maintains the audience's attention. But the old, dead romance is far more interesting than the present-day one, with more emotional impact and dramatic weight. However, the gorgeous English countrysides and personable, slyly witty performances makes this a worthwhile endeavor, regardless of which half of the movie you feel more attached to.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=6074&reviewer=247
originally posted: 08/29/02 02:23:32
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

4/02/12 Happy Hotpoint Ehle/Northam, the victorian lovers HOT and that's the way it goes. 5 stars
5/13/10 Lisa Marie Would have been better, more Northam/Ehle / less Paltrow much less. 4 stars
1/27/10 BARBARA RUECKHER Separated by almost 8ys - Kooler, I agre w/you. 4 stars
11/13/09 WYK153 Great...movie Northam & Ehle are great together!! 5 stars
10/22/08 em Lovely...especially Northam and Ehle! 5 stars
8/25/05 ES If this movie represented the only type of film movies would have died out years ago = dull 1 stars
11/27/04 Lit Fan Lots of potential, but dull execution, trite dialogue, poor character development 2 stars
6/18/04 S martin sleeper! 4 stars
11/05/03 TheOthersFan a contemptible conceit 3 stars
11/03/03 Taylor Fladgate An OK "chick flick" 3 stars
5/14/03 Angie Mooney The period scenes and actors carried it mostly, but Aaron Eckhart is charming in anything 4 stars
9/11/02 Veronica Foxx Paltrow/Eckhart romance was crapilicious. Bleh movie, but Northam is hot & did a fine job. 3 stars
8/29/02 Kooler Paltrow. Ick. 3 stars
8/29/02 Tamara Kiel great 5 stars
8/14/02 Heather Really good movie, could be one of this year's best 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  16-Aug-2002 (PG-13)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  05-Dec-2002




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast