Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
3.27

Awesome: 15.38%
Worth A Look: 19.23%
Just Average53.85%
Pretty Crappy: 0%
Sucks: 11.54%

2 reviews, 14 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Great Battle, The by Jay Seaver

True Fiction by Jay Seaver

Pick of the Litter by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Peter Sobczynski

House With A Clock In Its Walls, The by Peter Sobczynski

Life Itself (2018) by Peter Sobczynski

Unity of Heroes by Jay Seaver

Hanagatami by Jay Seaver

Predator, The by Jay Seaver

Fahrenheit 11/9 by Rob Gonsalves

subscribe to this feed


In-Laws, The (2003)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by EricDSnider

"Mediocre stuff, plus Albert Brooks, who deserves better."
3 stars

I hope Albert Brooks is happy knowing that when he appears in mediocre films like "The In-Laws," he is coming off as the brightest spot in them. Of course, he shines in good movies, too, but the light is even more radiant when all that surrounds him is dross.

I don't mean his co-stars. They are a charismatic bunch. Michael Douglas, as a rogue CIA agent whose son is about to marry Brooks' daughter, has his characteristic easy charm; Ryan Reynolds ("National Lampoon's Van Wilder") and Lindsay Sloane as the young couple are feisty and talented; Candace Bergen even shows up and earns a few chuckles as the CIA agent's bitter ex-wife. And Brooks, of course, has that soft, sarcastic whine that is both pleasing and amusing, like taking a warm bath with a clown, or something.

Their material, however, is second-rate. Based on the 1979 comedy, the rewritten screenplay by Nat Mauldin ("Dr. Dolittle") and Ed Solomon ("Charlie's Angels") offers the watered-down pablum that Hollywood cranks out by the fistful. Characters are forced into unlikely situations and then react unrealistically to them, eliminating any chance of humor.

And then there is Albert Brooks, who manages to rise above it and brings a few laughs. His understated delivery, his gentle neuroses, his expert comedy timing -- these are pivotal resources in any film, but especially one as weak as this. It is not reason enough to see it, really, but it's enough that if you are somehow forced into it, you will be able to survive. Brooks is a life preserver in a sea of C-grade belabored wackiness.

link directly to this review at http://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=7703&reviewer=247
originally posted: 06/05/03 02:55:58
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2003 Tribeca Film Festival. For more in the 2003 Tribeca Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

11/12/17 Anne Selby I'm sitting here writing this while the movie is playing 1 stars
11/18/06 Jack Sommersby Terrific star teamwork and agile direction make this nicely-written remake a pleasure. 4 stars
5/21/06 William Goss Surprisingly amusing, although not without feeling slightly guilty afterward 4 stars
5/21/06 Jeff Anderson An amusing, very funny & likable updating. Douglas & Brooks are great, that's what matters! 4 stars
12/05/05 R.W.Welch Cast is okay but material is not exactly inspired. 3 stars
9/26/05 Ben ALBERT BROOKS is always awesome.Everyone did a great job with what they had to work with. 4 stars
5/29/04 paul gunning good for a laugh 3 stars
2/09/04 Wesley Not going to win any awards, but for pure entertainment it's worth the money, HILARIOUS 4 stars
10/19/03 here I thought this was a GREAT movie and the actors did great also! 5 stars
7/24/03 May Q. Horney Among attempts at doing something different, here's one that actually works! 5 stars
7/12/03 Joe crap 1 stars
6/22/03 Hottie great funny film 5 stars
6/09/03 lazy sloppy movie Douglas and Brooks are charming, but the direction is pedestrian and the writing atrocious. 1 stars
6/04/03 lumjulx I thought it was very funny .. michael douglas definitely delivered a great performance.. 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  23-May-2003 (PG-13)

UK
  N/A

Australia
  28-Aug-2003




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast