Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
2.67

Awesome: 5.48%
Worth A Look27.4%
Just Average: 20.55%
Pretty Crappy: 21.92%
Sucks: 24.66%

6 reviews, 37 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Luxor by Peter Sobczynski

Wander by Peter Sobczynski

Love, Weddings & Other Disasters by Peter Sobczynski

Black Bear by Peter Sobczynski

Poison Rose, The by Jack Sommersby

Ma Rainey's Black Bottom by Jay Seaver

Fat Man and Little Boy by Jack Sommersby

Harry & Son by Jack Sommersby

Shattered by Jack Sommersby

Deathstalker II by Jack Sommersby

subscribe to this feed


Around the World in 80 Days (2004)
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Robert Flaxman

"Read the book instead."
2 stars

Usually the question when discussing a filmed adaptation of a written work is what has been changed from the original text. A better question concerning the 2004 adaptation of Around the World in Eighty Days, however, is to wonder what *hasn't* been changed.

The names of the main characters are the same - Phileas Fogg and his servant Passepartout. Their relationship is totally altered, however. In the Jules Verne novel, Fogg is suspected of a theft of 55,000 pounds from the Bank of England by the noble if misguided detective Fix, who follows him around the world. In the film, Passepartout (Jackie Chan) is the real thief, the theft is of a jade statue that had been stolen from his village in China, he pretends to be half-French, and Fix (Ewen Bremner) is a bumbling fool employed by the immensely over-the-top villain Lord Kelvin (Oscar-winner Jim Broadbent, doing his best Cuba Gooding Jr. post-Oscar role-picking imitation) to stop Fogg (Steve Coogan), rather than someone who honestly believes Fogg to be guilty of a crime.

The book, it must be said, is infinitely more fascinating than the film - this adaptation of it, at any rate. Around the World is sometimes effective with its humor, but mostly it is a display of Jackie Chan's martial artistry and a lot of slapstick, along with a modicum of dry wit from Coogan. Coogan's Fogg is several steps down from that of the novel; like the novel, the film seems to operate more from Passepartout's point of view even as it is told in the third person, but the novel's Fogg is an interesting enigma - even as the reader watches Fogg coolly perform heroic feats, we cannot shake the idea that perhaps he is indeed guilty of the crime of which he is suspected. After all, he lives alone and enjoys a respectable wealth of unknown origin.

Furthermore, Verne ratchets up the tension by leaving nothing out, seeming to show every minute of Fogg's quest. The film cuts parts of the voyage by necessity, but it's shocking how much is left out - we skip from Paris to Turkey to India to China to San Francisco to New York, with only enough time in each area for Passepartout to fend off the agents of a Chinese warlord intent on taking over his village. A sense of urgency is never established, which is problematic for a film whose title voyage should inspire nothing but. (As far as cutting time goes, the film is also an hour shorter than its 1956 counterpart, though director Frank Coraci should probably be thanked for this courtesy.)

It's somewhat understandable in this day and age that changes had to be made - many of the novel's most important moments are no longer very politically correct, or are just outright dated. However, most of the replacement plot elements aren't any better. While Fogg rescues an Indian woman from being burned alive as part of an outlawed ritual in the novel, the film's love interest is a gratingly perky French woman who is along for the ride from near the beginning.

The worst change occurs with the installation of so many villains and a complicated plot to explain their machinations. Broadbent's Lord Kelvin and the Chinese villains are all working together in an attempt to gain a large amount of jade, or something. It's a bit cloudy. The villains always manage to arrive in one place in time to meet Fogg and crew, and sometimes even get there first, which leads to the question: if traveling around the world in eighty days is so hard, why does everyone seem to be able to do it?

Of course, it's a bit unfair to judge the movie exclusively on its failure to live up to a famous novel, but on most other counts the film doesn't fare much better. The acting ranges between middling and passable all around, though at least that's not a cardinal sin in this sort of film. A bigger problem is the uninspiring nature of the martial arts scenes. The plot was tweaked quite a bit from the novel but most of the changes were to work Chan into the plot and thus accommodate various fight scenes - the scenes are hardly boring but there's nothing very standout about any of them. A scene in which Sammo Hung and the rest of a group called the Ten Tigers appear to help Chan repulse the village's invaders gives the whole affair the feel of a crossover movie - "Phileas Fogg Meets the Ten Tigers" conjures up memories of "The Harlem Globetrotters on Gilligan's Island".

The film's various slapstick sequences at least afford a few cheap laughs, but nothing ever rises to the level of inspired. The barrage of cameos, intended to ape the 1956 version of the film, grow tiresome, as do the cutesy historical references (the Wright Brothers selling bicycles, for example - and what were they doing in the Arizona desert anyway?). The filmmakers clearly thought that making Fogg a dreamer and inventor who risks losing the ability to invent ever again if he loses the bet would spice up the narrative, as the novel's bet was made solely for money, but they don't seem to realize how much drama they lost by way of all the changes. When the film attempts moments of gravitas, it's blissfully unaware of the fact that it has done nothing to earn them.

I'd like to say there isn't much that's truly awful about Around the World in Eighty Days, but its mangling of a classic novel is enough - the book's excitement is neutered and its strong characterizations have the life cut out of them; the destruction of the Fix character alone, and he's truly an awful character in this film, should be worth five to seven years in the prison for cinematic bad ideas.

Around the World in Eighty Days might be a passable diversion for easily-distracted youngsters, but a fifth-grade reading level is all the excuse you need to steer clear of this one and pick up the book instead. When even Jackie Chan has a hard time being entertaining, you know you're watching a movie that just isn't very good.

link directly to this review at https://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=10010&reviewer=385
originally posted: 11/23/04 04:24:44
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

2/16/18 Dr.Lao It wasn't terrible 3 stars
11/04/15 David Hollingsworth ridiculous and worthless. 1 stars
4/06/15 Imaad Unwatchable. Does full injustice to Jules Verne's book. 1 stars
8/26/08 PAUL SHORTT THE HEART AND SOUL OF IT, THE STORY AND THE CASTING, ARE A COMPLETE MESS 1 stars
2/22/08 Pamela White unbelieveably stupid 2 stars
1/01/07 Anthony Feor discusting 1 stars
11/29/06 Stanley Thai An enjoyable remake. Fun for the family. 4 stars
3/09/06 Dk A good idea goes out the window 2 stars
1/16/06 Ariadne Christina Renee Gladstone Who'da thunk it? I actually enjoyed a movie with Kathy Bates playing royalty! 4 stars
4/23/05 Quigley poor Shwarzenegger! what mindless bullcrap dribvel for Disney! nothing's new, i guess 1 stars
3/21/05 reptilesni I laughed like a fool through this whole thing! 5 stars
2/20/05 Captain Craig If you look at it as a movie made for familys and kids its fine. Jackie is always good. 4 stars
2/10/05 Jeff Anderson TERRIBLE REMAKE! I'd rather sit through endless viewings of CUTTHROAT ISLAND than this crap 1 stars
11/26/04 Destiny Pifer Pretty funny movie! 4 stars
9/06/04 Gregor I thought this movie was funny, and had a nice touch. Who cares if it is a remake. 4 stars
8/28/04 john bale Another dud remake, why bother, Coogans no David Niven, and Mike Todds not in sight. 2 stars
8/25/04 conor great awful 1 stars
8/19/04 Cape Canaveral Lavigne Though a likeable actor, J Chan's martial arts antics always get in way of a coherent plot. 4 stars
8/19/04 Ariadne Christina Renee Gladstone Who'da thunk it? I actually enjoyed a movie with Kathy Bates playing royalty! 4 stars
8/15/04 reptilesni What a wonderful film! Who really is a "hardcore" fan of this book anyway? 5 stars
7/29/04 Eloise wholesome family fun 4 stars
7/18/04 sally i loved this film. Enough action for my husband and son and enough story for me. Good fun. 5 stars
7/13/04 Clairemont Not that bad. Steve Coogan was the highlight. But check out some of his other work 3 stars
7/10/04 Chanie Jack Not as bad as the reviewer made out - enjoyable (if rather low-brow) entertainment. 4 stars
7/07/04 jenny oh man this was the worst movie i have ever seen in my whole life 1 stars
7/06/04 mazie i thought it was absalute pants 1 stars
6/29/04 Roxie It was pretty cute. Not fantastic, but still enjoyable. 4 stars
6/28/04 Sephylon Greenleaf Surprisingly not sucktastic. A warmhearted, amusing adventure for seekers of grand escapism 4 stars
6/22/04 Drummie It tickled my laughing bones.. 4 stars
6/21/04 jam good-humored 4 stars
6/21/04 jc hm 5 stars
6/20/04 SIr Spam-a-lot Pierce Brosnan and Eric Idle in the TV VERSION were MUCH better.... 2 stars
6/18/04 Emily i liked the fighting scene 3 stars
6/18/04 Bob F. Sandler's friendship can't bail Coraci out of this one. 1 stars
6/17/04 Alex A fun summer action comedy. The cameos are great. 4 stars
6/17/04 Karl Even the cameos can't save this one. Stay away at all costs. 1 stars
6/17/04 dave blah, jackie chan should retire 1 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  16-Jun-2004 (PG)
  DVD: 02-Nov-2004

UK
  N/A

Australia
  26-Aug-2004




Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast