Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Awesome: 24.29%
Worth A Look: 12.86%
Just Average: 1.43%
Pretty Crappy: 4.29%

4 reviews, 46 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Playing with Fire by Jack Sommersby

Dragnet by Jack Sommersby

Keep the Change by Jack Sommersby

Suspect by Jack Sommersby

Harry Chapin: When in Doubt, Do Something by Rob Gonsalves

Trial of the Chicago 7, The by Rob Gonsalves

St. Elmo's Fire by Jack Sommersby

Talent for the Game by Jack Sommersby

Lupin III: The Castle of Cagliostro by Jay Seaver

Borat Subsequent Moviefilm by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed

[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Peter Sobczynski

"When It Comes To Mixing Gangsters And Metaphysics, Guy, Let It Be"
1 stars

In “Revolver,” his first film since directing wife Madonna in that ill-advised and fairly disastrous 2002 remake of “Swept Away,” writer-director Guy Ritchie tries to merge the ultra-flashy hipster crime film genre (one that he previously explored in “Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels” and “Snatch”) with the kind of head-scratching narrative structure found in such brilliant-yet-befuddling works as “Inland Empire,” “Southland Tales” and Francis Ford Coppola’s upcoming “Youth Without Youth.” Now as anyone who has read my reviews regularly no doubt knows by now, I have always had a soft spot for weirdo films that offer viewers a puzzle with too few pieces (or too many, depending on your point of view) and let them fit it all together on their own. I have also liked Ritchie’s past films (aside from “Swept Away,” of course) for their audaciousness and the dynamic energy that he brought to his material–they may have been unapologetic Tarantino knock-offs but as such things go, they were among the best of that otherwise sorry subgenre. However, these are two cinematic tastes that do not necessarily taste great together, as “Revolver” makes painfully clear. This is one of the most utterly bewildering films to come along in a long time and in this particular case, this is not a compliment. If you somehow manage to make it to the bitter end, you will no longer be asking yourself why the film has been sitting on a shelf since 2005–you will be asking how it managed to get so far along as to make it onto the shelf in the first without someone–a producer, an actor, a key grip–trying to stop it from proceeding in order to spare embarrassment all around.

Ritchie regular Jason Statham stars as Jake Green, a high-stakes gambler who, as the film opens, is being released from prison after doing a seven-year stretch thanks to the machinations of local crime boss Dorothy Macha (Ray Liotta). Having spent that time soaking up wisdom gleaned from textbooks and studies of game theory, Jake believes that he can beat Macha at his own game and on his first night out, he visits his adversary at his casino and cleans him out. Outraged, Macha orders a hit on Jake but it may not be necessary–after taking a fall down a flight of stairs, Jake is informed that he has a rare blood disease and will die within three days. At the same time, he is approached by two loan sharks, Zack (Vincent Pastore) and Avi (Andre Benjamin), who make him an offer that he can’t refuse–they will protect him from Macha’s men but in return, he has to work for them, do everything they say without question and give them all of his money to use for their operation. Mysteriously, Jake agrees to this plan and while giving away all of his money, he embarks on a series of tricks that places Macha into direct conflict with the fearsome and unseen gangland boss Mr. Gold.

This is about all I can say regarding the plot of “Revolver” for a couple of reasons. For one, this is one of those stories that continually yanks the rug out from under us with a series of surprise reveals that force us to reevaluate everything that we have been watching every ten minutes or so. For another, the storyline is so completely convoluted in its blend of oddball violence, heavy-handed philosophizing and allegedly colorful supporting characters (including a hitman stricken with pangs of conscience, Chinese gangsters and Francesca Annis as Mr. Gold’s representative) that I defy anyone–including Ritchie and Luc Besson (who is mysteriously credited with “adapting” Ritchie’s screenplay)–to explain what the hell is going on at any given point. Before long, it simply devolves into a never-ending series of scenes in which Statham offers the kind of profundities about the human condition that are normally rejected by the publishers of fortune cookie fillings, Liotta screams at the top of his lungs while clad in little more than a pair of Speedos and people that we barely know are shot to pieces for reasons that we can barely comprehend. Perhaps in order to distract us from the basic incoherence of the storyline, the film also throws in self-conscious stylistic flourishes like having scenes suddenly turn into animation for no apparent reason.

As I said before, I normally cherish films that defiantly break with the rules of traditional screen narrative. The difference between a film like “Revolver” and something like “Inland Empire” or “Youth Without Youth” is that while it may be impossible to explain what David Lynch and Francis Ford Coppola were trying to say in those particular efforts, they maintained a certain internal logic and while viewers may not have been able to fully grasp what was going on, you at least had the sense that their directors knew what they were going for and that if you paid close enough attention, it might eventually click for you as well at some point down the road. With “Revolver,” on the other hand, I never believed for a second that Guy Ritchie had any idea of what, if anything, he was trying to convey with all of his various tricks and twists. Instead, it feels as if he came up with an idea for another crime film, got bored with it halfway through and suddenly decided to throw in all this surreal and metaphysical nonsense in an effort to explain away its essentially disjointed nature. This is exceptionally aggravating when you finally realize that the basic philosophy of the film can pretty much be summed up in a few words–words which I won’t share in the event that you inexplicably choose to see it–that Ritchie seems unwilling or incapable of stating in plain English.

It would be easy enough to write off “Revolver” as the kind of inexplicable folly that most talented filmmakers (and yes, I do fit Ritchie into that category) come up with at least once in their career. The only problem with that particular theory is that it was pretty much assumed by one and all that he had just that folly a few years ago with “Swept Away” but even that film seems more like a perfectly understandable misstep when compared to this disaster, which wastes some admittedly stylish photography and the commanding screen presences of Statham and Liotta on material not even worthy of their lighting doubles. With all of its philosophizing, “Revolver” clearly wants to be considered a thinking man’s crime film but it turns out to be anything but in the end. This may not be the single dumbest movie of the year but, to paraphrase Tommy Lee Jones in “No Country For Old Men” (a film as good as this one is bad), it will do until the dumbest one finally arrives.

link directly to this review at https://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=12871&reviewer=389
originally posted: 12/07/07 01:12:12
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2005 Toronto Film Festival For more in the 2005 Toronto Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

4/16/13 Flipsider Ritchie put psycholgists in the credits to explain what the movie was about. Says it all. 2 stars
12/09/09 A.Wilson Probably the most polarizing film of all time, most people wont understand it Mr.Gold wont 5 stars
3/25/09 Monday Morning Muddled plot, lame acting, a waste of time. And oh, Madonna sucks in her own right. 2 stars
12/03/08 Shaun Wallner Very Boring! 1 stars
7/26/08 pin Psuedointellectual Trainwreck. Truly Awful. 1 stars
6/19/08 OwlJulie Loved the elevator scene. This movie is spiritual, about getting hold of your demons. 5 stars
12/12/07 cristi interesting mind game this movie 5 stars
12/11/07 Emanouil R/evolve/r is not for the Majority. The FILM delivers a profund truth you aren't ready for. 5 stars
12/08/07 Naurto See? Marry Madonna and your career goes to shit. 1 stars
12/08/07 Max I was told by a friend this was a "mind fuck" ala Fight Club/Matrix. WORST MOVIE EVER!!!! 1 stars
12/05/07 Mick Guy Richies take on intelligent sci-fi,future cult classic. 5 stars
9/09/07 Andy Excellent! Worth watching a second time to appreciate it fully. 4 stars
4/27/07 pervez khan it gives u an idea of how to rule and that is , to have some mental strength. 5 stars
10/22/06 Kyle E God forbid an action film with abstract symbolism. quite a thinker 5 stars
10/22/06 Yusef Its symbolic showing how money controls man "MR Green" if you see this its great 5 stars
9/25/06 skunk a movie that requires you to think, consider, reconsider and genuinely use your brain! gold 5 stars
5/30/06 Fer A challenging, exciting and engaging film. Not for grandma or people expecting Snatch 2 5 stars
5/02/06 Dracon Movie = Marvel. Must see for educated individuals. Requires full attention. 5 stars
4/28/06 MrSorter I found myself liking it from the get go.. a few bumps but by the end.. if you get it..wow! 4 stars
4/14/06 a awesome 5 stars
4/12/06 Jordan Bradbury Didn't understand all of it, but enough to know that it is an awesome movie. 5 stars
12/14/05 Apple I have no idea what this film is trying to portry, but it looks cool. 4 stars
12/14/05 gunzoller great movie. great perfomance. real art-house. 5 stars
12/06/05 stickman can words describe how shit this flick is? 1 stars
10/20/05 Vitok Watch it several times to understand that you are about to commit a suicide 1 stars
10/15/05 Bo A huge disappointment for what was going to be the greatest comeback ever 2 stars
10/09/05 Uncle Salty If I can't say anything nice, I won't say anthing at all. 1 stars
10/03/05 Jon Riordan Weird movie, started off really well, then about 45 mins in began to lose itself. Worth see 3 stars
9/29/05 Pete Great film - unless you like to be spoonfed a story 5 stars
9/26/05 beanhead so what and who was real and what was in his head ?? 1 stars
9/26/05 Bexx what the hell was it about, i just dont get it 1 stars
9/25/05 Leon intellectual plot very cleve...guns and violence with enough leaves you working it out A+ 5 stars
9/24/05 Big G Terrible. The greatest load of bollocks since .... ever! 1 stars
9/23/05 Russ ridiculous 1 stars
9/23/05 jonmac what in heaven have i just witnessed? nonsense!! neel, snap out of it!!! 1 stars
9/22/05 Mark G Painful to watch! What a let down. 1 stars
9/21/05 Mark T. Absolute rubbish!!!! 1 stars
9/21/05 Mark T. Absolute rubbish!!!! 1 stars
9/21/05 Mark T. Absolute rubbish!!!! 1 stars
9/21/05 Mark T. Absolute rubbish!!!! 1 stars
9/21/05 John M. Worse film in years!!! 1 stars
9/21/05 Keith Piper CRAP!!!! 1 stars
9/19/05 Neel Idiots of today, namely Katrina and Alex you dont know squat about films. Go read a book. 5 stars
9/13/05 Katrina saw it at the preview screening - worst movie of all time. 1 stars
9/12/05 Alex Brisbourne Astonishingly bad: I'm a great ritchie fan (maybe, was). Needs User Guide to follow it! 1 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  07-Dec-2007 (R)
  DVD: 18-Mar-2008



Directed by
  Guy Ritchie

Written by
  Guy Ritchie

  Jason Statham
  Ray Liotta
  André Benjamin
  Vincent Pastore
  Andrew Howard
  Vincent Riotta

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast