Jamie Kennedy's favorite movie review site
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 

Overall Rating

Worth A Look: 35.79%
Just Average: 7.37%
Pretty Crappy: 8.42%
Sucks: 10.53%

7 reviews, 53 user ratings

Latest Reviews

Old Guard, The by Peter Sobczynski

Greyhound by Peter Sobczynski

Guest of Honour by Peter Sobczynski

Miss Fisher and the Crypt of Tears by Jay Seaver

Dealer/Healer by Jay Seaver

City Without Baseball by Jay Seaver

Invisible Man, The (2020) by Rob Gonsalves

Hunt, The (2020) by Rob Gonsalves

Da 5 Bloods by Rob Gonsalves

Hamilton by Peter Sobczynski

subscribe to this feed

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by David Cornelius

"Better and better and better..."
5 stars

Just when we thought the “Harry Potter” series could offer us no new wonders, along comes “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix,” in which we thrill to the magical city hidden beneath London, and the all-too-brief glimpse at the mysterious centaurs, and the secret rooms and the hidden passageways, and the epic battle between wizards, in which magic can turn flying shards of glass into white sand.

“Phoenix” is indeed a magical film, effortlessly capturing the splendor and delight of the “Potter” franchise. It maintains the technical and artistic levels that the previous films have set - and too often in the discussion of this series it is forgotten that these are impeccably crafted works, gorgeous in their design, bringing an entirely other world to life without a single seam showing. We’re so accustomed to movies looking great that we sometimes take it for granted when they’re actually able to do so without having it be at the expense of story or character. “Phoenix” reminds us that effects-laden blockbusters can also have heart and soul.

It also dares to dump much of the source material. Much has been said among fans about how, at 138 minutes, “Phoenix” has the shortest running time of all the films while being an adaptation of the longest of all the books. What screenwriter Michael Goldenberg (new to this series, replacing four-time scripter Steve Kloves) attempts is a complete streamlining; he strips the story to its barest essentials, and it works. The focus is tighter, the plotting is leaner, and while the saga retains its epic scope, there’s a dramatic urgency that might have gotten lost in a longer, looser picture.

The director for this entry is David Yates, the veteran of British television and helmer of the excellent “The Girl in the Café.” Yates has proven himself an expert at intimate storytelling, and that’s what helps the series here: close attention paid to personal interaction. Yates delicately balances the fantastic with the dramatic, gloriously oversized visuals with quieter character growth.

Because of this, our attention never wanders, which is important, as things are getting darker by the day for our old pal Harry. We could easily lose our interest in this boy who is no longer an outsider wowed by the magical world he never knew existed - his sense of wonder is fading as he becomes an essential part of that very world. Harry Potter is the central figure in a Tolkien-sized adventure, riddled with complications of too many characters and too many secrets to be revealed. The temptation, then, for the movie series is to get too dark, too serious, too lost in its own web of internal mythology, and, by extension, it would lose its audience.

But Goldenberg’s screenplay remains so sharply focused throughout that the plot never has a chance to get away from us. Yes, it is dark. Yes, it is serious. But it also pauses for the occasional sidestep into new wondrous discoveries (at which Harry - and we - still marvel), and by doing so, the script lets us see this tangled mythology through Harry’s own eyes. By refusing to step away for games of Quidditch or subplots involving Ron or Hermione, we’re reminded that this whole thing is about one boy, who is growing up before our very eyes.

“Phoenix” works in plenty of metaphors for growing up: the discovery of a greater, more complex world around you; a higher awareness in politics and world events; a growing fear that you’re not ready for adulthood; an uncertainty of self. The latter is a key theme: plagued by dreams involving the evil Lord Voldemort, he begins to fear a greater connection between himself and his enemy; the film, then, reveals his internal struggle. Could he become the very thing he dreads? Fortunately for Harry, he has excellent teachers to help aim his moral compass. Sirius Black tells him “we have all got both light and dark inside us. What matters is the power we chose to act on.” And later, Dumbledore tells Harry, “It isn’t how you’re like him. It’s how you’re not.” It’s the classic journey, the crossroads at which he realizes he is worthy of being a hero.

Since the story is busy dishing out symbolism, it also tosses up a few jabs at the state of world affairs. The Ministry of Magic is presented as a collection of incompetent leaders blinded by their own fears and self-righteous beliefs. The sinister Dolores Umbridge, loyal to a fault, is eager to embrace admittedly illegal interrogation tactics to achieve her own ends. Dissenting viewpoints are muted at every chance. It would seem, perhaps, that JK Rowling is none too happy with the way things are going in the real world.

Or is this digging too far and looking too closely? Perhaps. For nothing that happens in “Phoenix” is as clumsily obvious as the metaphors on display in, say, “Revenge of the Sith” (a film I absolutely love, even with those clumsy metaphors; it, too, tells the story of a young man challenged by dark temptations, only he succumbs where Harry does not). And, mercifully, the movie refuses to dive too deeply in otherworldly politicking, allowing the plot to provide just enough to keep the drama moving forward. The events in this film are never dry, never stuffy, never uninvolving. It’s not C-Span for Muggles, it’s “Harry Potter,” and this means the magic, the heroics, the sheer wonder of it all is always up front.

And back to Harry. We have watched the character grow up, and yes, we have watched Daniel Radcliffe do the same. I mentioned it in my review of “Goblet of Fire” and it deserves mentioning again: the young cast is improving with age, never content to rest on assured successes. Radcliffe here is willing to take chances and expose an emotionally vulnerable side of himself, and the result is cracking drama that never forgets its human side.

The supporting players are as dependable as always, never a false move. Young and old, there’s not a bad apple in the bunch. How could there be, really, when this franchise has become a who’s-who of British acting, offering up only the finest talent available? It’s refreshing to see everyone return, even if only for a moment. It’s like a family reunion.

New to the cast are Imelda Staunton, whose turn Umbridge is equal parts pure evil and total comic genius (by making her character so unequivocally perky and faux-quaint, she somehow becomes even more sinister), and Helena Bonham Carter as the demented villainess Bellatrix Lestrange, a part that here feels just a bit too small, a hint of bigger things to come.

The most important new addition is Evanna Lynch as fellow student Luna Lovegood. Lynch made headlines as the winner of a casting contest; a lifelong Harry Potter fanatic, she had never acted before. But Lynch’s performance is not just some a casting gimmick. She’s the real deal, an enchanting lass who breathes life into her character. Her character is a calm in the middle of a great storm, and Lynch brings a quiet honest and a gentle quirkiness to that calm. In a cast filled with the best of the best, Lynch is a standout, and a genuine discovery for the ages.

And this is how it works with Harry Potter. One minute you’re just another anonymous person, the next, you’re busy saving the world. The series has shown us so many wondrous things, and it has many more on the way.

link directly to this review at https://www.hollywoodbitchslap.com/review.php?movie=16219&reviewer=392
originally posted: 07/12/07 03:34:04
[printer] printer-friendly format  

User Comments

2/14/15 jason gracio the WORST FILM EVER MADE TIE WITH TWILIGHT 1 stars
1/06/15 suck i can honestly this the worst film i have ever seen 1 stars
7/26/09 David Worst of the series 3 stars
7/13/09 cody this movie is another good fllim in the harry potter series, that teacher is a butt!!! 4 stars
10/27/08 Michael M Yates creates an emotional connection with the audience when none of the previos flims did. 4 stars
10/25/08 Shaun Wallner Interesting Movie! 4 stars
8/31/08 Samantha Pruitt could have been longer, but still great, helens bonham carter was awesome! 5 stars
5/04/08 Franklin D Roosevelt Great movie 5 stars
3/20/08 Soph Very rushed; I almost expected Harry and co to start talking in squirrel voices. 2 stars
1/17/08 X Wang Yes, there are differences from the book - but still a very entertaining movie 4 stars
12/12/07 ES Enjoyable for a kid's movie 4 stars
11/14/07 Awesome People who only watch the movies will never get the whole story of the movie. 5 stars
11/14/07 PIMP It's the best one of all times 5 stars
11/06/07 Mohammad nawaz harry potter is great novel 4 stars
9/29/07 pamela ruvalcaba the movie is very good, i like daniel radcliffe 5 stars
9/08/07 pete total crap nothing like the book,totaly lost until I read the book great acting and effects 2 stars
8/27/07 Dan Leaves out key points from the book, and i have a fealing this movie ment to be longer. 2 stars
8/21/07 dude!!! this was a awsome movie but you need to read the book to get it 5 stars
8/20/07 SGlassman Worst movie. No character development which is important later on. 1 stars
8/16/07 Lilly potter Please get another director. Someone with imagination. 2 stars
8/13/07 U Don't Wanna Know This movie a few great effects, but thats all, if you havent read the book u're lost. 1 stars
8/11/07 Gurdeep People have to realize that books are one thing and movies another, I think it was great!! 5 stars
8/10/07 Kaitlin extremely disappointing! the acting was good but the film was nothing like the book. 1 stars
8/10/07 David's Sister It's totally gutted the masterful plot and character development. 1 stars
8/08/07 Neila Very disappointed ,worst hp ever 1 stars
7/30/07 Riktor Worst Film so far, Completly not like the book at all, Remove David yates Plz. 3 stars
7/28/07 sue the best one i have seen - dark and dangerous just like all good thrillers 5 stars
7/27/07 Navin R Whoo ,big letdown .This film stank 1 stars
7/26/07 Bitchflaps The worst Harry Potter film yet. I pray David Yates doesn't screw the next one up. 2 stars
7/25/07 sunny the best movie ever 5 stars
7/22/07 C Note Easily best of the series; Harry finally takes charge instead of being led around 5 stars
7/20/07 Randy This was nothing like the book! So many plot changes, it's unbelievable! 2 stars
7/19/07 Janet If you read the book, you hated the movie! They should have made it longer !!! 1 stars
7/19/07 miss elliott bloody brilliant 5 stars
7/19/07 Jake B Not a fan of the books, but this is a great instalment of a great FILM series 5 stars
7/18/07 melissa great movie..the battle and rebellion : really interesting..acting n effects : great 4 stars
7/18/07 Austin Wertman terrible 1 stars
7/17/07 orpy ho hum 3 stars
7/17/07 pin Entertaining yet, flat. Adaptation a bit superficial. They lost the story for the details. 3 stars
7/16/07 NeoMalfoy After the letdown of Goblet this was a releif best Potter adaption yet! 5 stars
7/16/07 SteveM A lot lot better than I thought it was going to be 5 stars
7/15/07 R K Felt let down. Effects / characters /acting great. Story line sucks and predictable. 3 stars
7/14/07 Jed Not flawless but it was entertaining 4 stars
7/14/07 Dark Enchantress it was good, im not a big harry potter fan, bit i enjoyed the movie 4 stars
7/14/07 KingNeutron Highly recommended - I see parallels of this film in my own life. 5 stars
7/14/07 Sourav Good one to watch...better than most of the other Harry Potter films expect maybe the 1st 1 5 stars
7/14/07 sarah not so good 2 stars
7/13/07 Matthew Extremely well done, the best of the Harry Potter movies 5 stars
7/13/07 Ole Man Bourbon Much better than the others I've seen--Order was suspenseful and even interesting at times. 4 stars
7/12/07 Adrian A perfect adaptiation of the most expository book in the series. 5 stars
7/12/07 Hello Stranger harry is completely tortured by the end of the film. no smiles. no action for 3/4 of film. 3 stars
7/11/07 Stacy Acting, casting, mood -- great as always. The adaptation this time seemed messy, though. 3 stars
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:

Discuss this movie in our forum

  11-Jul-2007 (PG-13)
  DVD: 11-Dec-2007

  12-Jul-2007 (12A)

  11-Jul-2007 (M)

Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  Contests About 
Privacy Policy | | HBS Inc. |   
All data and site design copyright 1997-2017, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast